1990
DOI: 10.2514/3.26151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowfield and vehicle parameter influence on hypersonic heat transfer and drag

Abstract: A numerical study of several parameters that influence heat transfer, drag, and shock-layer mass-flow rate at laminar and transitional (laminar and turbulent) flow conditions was conducted. The calculations were performed with a detailed computer code, which has been demonstrated to yield excellent comparisons with flightand ground-test data and with results of other detailed codes. The study focuses the attention of designers of future transatmospheric vehicles on fundamental parameters, such as bluntness and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the observations obtained by Zoby and Thompson. 30 Further, the pressure drag for some blunted bodies may account for nearly 100% of the total drag, as stated in Singh. 31 Second, the viscosity coefficient of the free stream air is very small under the experimental setup in Li.…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the observations obtained by Zoby and Thompson. 30 Further, the pressure drag for some blunted bodies may account for nearly 100% of the total drag, as stated in Singh. 31 Second, the viscosity coefficient of the free stream air is very small under the experimental setup in Li.…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In conclusion, we note that the calculation of fully turbulent flow past elongated bodies starting from the stagnation point is permissible, since the heat flux values in the region where the laminar-turbulent transition is complete coincide with those corresponding to earlier transition [3,9,10].…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypersonic turbulent flow past cones with half-angles Ok= 10, 20, and 30 ~ and surface temperatures tw=0.05 , 0.2, 0.6 was calculated for Reoo = 106, 107, 108 and Moo =6, 8,10. The flow equations were integrated from the forward stagnation point over a distance x=2OOR w. Figure 1 shows the calculated plots of the Stanton number St (curve 1) and the friction coefficient Cf (curve 2) against the distance s measured in blunmess radii from the stagnation point along the cone surface:…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is due to pressure changes related to surface curvature variations induced by blending of the nose (e.g., downstream effects of nose blunting that originate a combining effect of the entropy layer and AoA) and wing sections into the VTO main fuselage [13,16]. Therefore, the comparisons show the effect of local entropy values, thus highlighting, in addition, the fact that the CIRA approximate code considers that the shock layer is rotational only [17]. Indeed, the bow shock produced by the blunted nose facing the flow at AoA generates entropy gradients in the inviscid shock layer, thus resulting in inviscid velocity gradient normal to the VTO surface that the CIRA-SIM code does not take into account for (e.g., the entropy layer) [15,18].…”
Section: Reliability Of Design Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 94%