Flowering Resources Modulate the Sensitivity of Bumblebees to a Common Fungicide

Wintermantel, Dimitry; Pereira-Peixoto, Maria-Helena; Warth, Nadja; Melcher, Kristin; Faller, Michael; Feurer, Joachim; Allan, Matthew J.; Dean, Robin; Tamburini, Giovanni; Knauer, Anina; Schwarz, Janine Melanie; Albrecht, Matthias; Klein, Alexandra‐Maria

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3989507

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results obtained here using queenright colonies are in line with previous research on queenright bumble bee colonies that demonstrate a negative impact on colony development by a low‐protein diet (Vaudo et al, 2016) and monofloral pollen (e.g., Baloglu & Gurel, 2015; Hass et al, 2019), and Cistus pollen in particular (Baloglu & Gurel, 2015). Our results further support findings that bumble bees require different floral resources to improve colony fitness (Wintermantel et al, 2022).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Consequently, nutritional insufficiencies in the diet can lead to an increased larval mortality or a smaller adult body size (Brodschneider & Crailsheim, 2010). As such, this study confirms the importance of the availability of high‐quality pollen resources (such as the HQ diet in this study) for larval development and hence colony development, whereby protein content and high source plant diversity can determine quality (Wintermantel et al, 2022). A further noteworthy finding is that larval mortality, overall, was considerably higher in microcolonies (37.1% on average for the control treatment) than in queenright colonies (8.2% on average for the control treatment), while receiving the same pollen, sugar water, and while exposed to identical conditions.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Re‐evaluation of a method used to study nutritional effects on bumble bees

Wynants

Wäckers

Oystaeyen

2022

Ecological Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bee declines are an increasingly recognised problem globally. Nutritional stress due to agricultural intensification is one of the drivers of bee declines. Therefore, understanding the nutritional requirements of bees is crucial to mitigate the effects of food scarcity on bee populations. Laboratory studies evaluating nutritional effects on bumble bees often use microcolonies as a model system for effects on queenright colonies. Microcolonies consist of workers, whereby one worker will lay male‐destined unfertilized eggs. Consequently, microcolonies exclusively produce males, while queenright colonies produce (female) workers and reproductives (males and queens). A comparison between Bombus terrestris (L.) microcolonies and queenright colonies was made by feeding three diets of varying nutritional quality. The experimental diets affected most fitness parameters of microcolonies differently than those of queenright colonies. Low‐protein, largely monofloral, pollen affected queenright colony fitness by reducing colony size and increasing larval mortality, while these fitness parameters were not affected in microcolonies. High‐protein polyfloral pollen reduced larval mortality in queenright colonies but did not affect larval mortality in microcolonies. For both colony types, a similar result was obtained when assessing offspring body mass, which was reduced by the low‐quality diet and increased by the high‐quality diet. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that microcolonies are inaccurate model systems and their use can lead to erroneous conclusions in terms of effects of nutritional stress or pollen quality on bumble bees. Our results further highlight the importance of high‐quality (here high‐protein polyfloral) pollen for sustaining colony development of bumble bees.

show abstract