2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowcytometry in myelodysplastic syndromes: Towards a new paradigm in diagnosis and prognostication?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The original FCSS was modified to give additional weight to these marrows in order to reflect the importance of the presence of abnormal MyPC, which has been previously reported in other prognostic and diagnostic studies (13, 17–20). In this study, three cases were identified with less than 5% abnormal MyPC without myelomonocytic abnormalities and were given a modified FCSS of two including: one case with del(5q) and monosomy 7 having clearly abnormal MyPC present at 1.5% showing decreased CD45 and decreased CD13; a del(20q) case with MyPC present at 4.4% with reduced CD45; and a case of trisomy 8 with MyPC showing reduced CD45, dim CD7, and dim CD13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original FCSS was modified to give additional weight to these marrows in order to reflect the importance of the presence of abnormal MyPC, which has been previously reported in other prognostic and diagnostic studies (13, 17–20). In this study, three cases were identified with less than 5% abnormal MyPC without myelomonocytic abnormalities and were given a modified FCSS of two including: one case with del(5q) and monosomy 7 having clearly abnormal MyPC present at 1.5% showing decreased CD45 and decreased CD13; a del(20q) case with MyPC present at 4.4% with reduced CD45; and a case of trisomy 8 with MyPC showing reduced CD45, dim CD7, and dim CD13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the extensive variability from patient to patient as well as the changes that occur over time for an individual patient, single specific antigenic changes are not sufficient to fully capture the extent of regulation loss. 13,20,22,23 The abnormalities seen are not just in the expression of single antigens but affect the relationships between multiple antigens. 13,[19][20][21] Panels of monoclonal antibodies must be integrated so researchers can focus on the steps of myeloid and monocyte development in which multiple gene products are co-regulated and thus note the loss of coordination of regulation of gene products at multiple steps during development.…”
Section: Phenotypic Changes In Neoplastic Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Other abnormalities can be seen in physical changes of cell size (detected by forward light scatter) and granularity (identified by right angle light scatter or side scatter, where the included granules in myeloid cells act like tiny mirrors reflecting light into the detector). [19][20][21][22] Phenotypic abnormalities on the myeloblasts have been studied on total CD34 positive cells, 17 immature or maturing CD34 positive cells, 24 or the entire maturing myeloblast population independent of CD34 expression. 19,21,25 Flow cytometry analysis (focusing on normal/ abnormal blasts, myeloid and monocyte development) to detect phenotypic abnormalities (phenotypic dysplasia) can be complementary to morphologic analysis of bone marrow.…”
Section: Phenotypic Changes In Neoplastic Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques are not standardized and may be less specific for MDS. Another approach is to determine cell surface antigen patterns in CD34 + blast cells and more mature myeloid cells by flow cyometry [21–24]. Likewise, flow cytometry is a powerful tool for assessment of aberrant marker expression in CD34 + blasts [21–24].…”
Section: Co‐criteria For the Definition Of Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, results obtained by this technique are not specific for MDS. However, flow cytometry and molecular studies are reliable and sensitive techniques that may help in reaching the conclusion that the patient is suffering from a monoclonal myeloid disorder resembling MDS [19–23]. In addition, using new techniques, it may also be possible to quantify the various bone marrow lineages in MDS by flow cytometry [25].…”
Section: Co‐criteria For the Definition Of Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%