2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FloWatch versus conventional pulmonary artery banding

Abstract: FloWatch pulmonary artery banding appears superior to conventional pulmonary artery banding because (1) reoperations are not required; (2) postoperative management is simplified and postoperative mechanical ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit, and stay in the hospital are significantly reduced; and (3) the reduction in costs of postoperative mechanical ventilation, stay in the intensive care unit, and stay in the hospital significantly outweigh the cost of the device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(52 reference statements)
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Τhere is statistical significant difference between groups concerning the percentage change from baseline to 10 minute of the SVR variable and a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 20 minute (p = 0.075). Our recordings of a low MAP and low SVR in both groups are consistent with the results described by other investigators [20-22]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Τhere is statistical significant difference between groups concerning the percentage change from baseline to 10 minute of the SVR variable and a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 20 minute (p = 0.075). Our recordings of a low MAP and low SVR in both groups are consistent with the results described by other investigators [20-22]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Better PAB material should be developed to improve the procedure and decrease re-PAB. The present available FloWatch Flow-PAB might be a good option since some long-term result is established [13][14][15]. However, the size may not be available at present for these adult CHD patients because the pulmonary artery size of elevated pressure is usually over 40 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some early proponents of FW-PAB have reported encouraging results. 17,19 In 2004, a European multi-institutional clinical study demonstrated feasibility, but, according to the authors, ''did not prove the clinical efficacy of the Flo-Watch PAB 2 2 0 20 50 100 2 VSD 1 1 0 50 50 95 3 AVSD Removed the same day of implantation 4 VSD 3 3 0 60 55 96 5 VSD 3 2 1 60 70 95 6 VSD 6 3 3 25 40 95 7 VSD 4 3 1 30 45 97 8 VSD 4 4 0 50 40 97 9 c-TGA 5 5 0 75 45 97 10 VSD 3 3 0 35 55 90 11 AVSD 3 3 0 60 70 compared with standard approaches'' (p. II162). 17 Bonnet and associates concluded, ''When larger sizes will be available and the telemetric control improved, the most interesting indication will probably be left ventricular training in older patients with transposition-intact ventricular septum or double discordance.''…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early proponents have reported satisfactory results. 17,19 One study claimed distinct advantages over conventional PAB with respect to length of postoperative mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital. This study was undertaken to compare the results obtained in our unit with FloWatch PAB (FW-PAB) to those obtained with conventional pulmonary artery banding (conv-PAB).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%