The efficacy of crushed-rock samples vs. small plugs or full-diameter core samples for measurement of porosity, permeability, and fluid saturation is an important consideration in the evaluation of tight-gas reservoirs and shale-gas reservoirs. Crushed-rock core analysis methods originally developed for shale reservoirs are now, in some cases, being extended to low-quality tight-gas reservoirs. In this study, crushed-rock and full-diameter core measurements from two wells drilled with oil-based mud are compared to evaluate which of the two core-analysis methods is more reliable for water-saturation assessment of a major North American tightgas siltstone play (Montney Formation, western Canada). Measurements from the studied full-diameter core samples have wide ranges of water saturation (10 to 45%) and bulk volume water (BVW) (0.5 to 2.6%). In contrast, measurements from crushedrock samples have much narrower ranges of water saturation (10 to 20%) and BVW (0.2 to 0.7%). The lower values and limited range of water-content measurements from crushed-rock samples suggest a significant degree of artificial water loss during sample handling in the laboratory. This conclusion is supported by comparing core-measured BVW with deep-resistivity values from openhole well logs. Full-diameter BVW measurements correlate well with log resistivity, indicating they are generally representative of in-situ reservoir conditions. Crushed-rock BVW values, on the other hand, show no correlation with log resistivity. The results of this study suggest caution is warranted in the use of crushed-rock samples for water-saturation measurements of siltstones or silty shales. Failure to recognize artificial water loss from crushed-rock siltstone samples could lead to an erroneous interpretation of irreducible water saturation at in-situ reservoir conditions with potentially serious implications for resource evaluation and exploitation.
IntroductionThe distribution of connate water in tight-gas reservoirs is an important consideration for many aspects of resource exploitation including selecting geographic areas for multiwell development programs, identifying landing zones for horizontal wells, estimating permeability, calculating reserves, and understanding variability in gas and water production. The acquisition of reliable water-saturation measurements from core samples is therefore a key element in resource evaluation of tight-gas plays.Petrophysical studies indicate that shale-gas and tight and conventional reservoirs form a reservoir-quality continuum (Aguilera 2010(Aguilera , 2013. Methods for measuring porosity, permeability, and fluid saturation of drill-core samples generally differ along this continuum: Small-plug and/or full-diameter samples are typically used for conventional and higher-quality tight-gas reservoirs, whereas crushed-rock samples are typically used for shale-gas reservoirs. Crushed-rock methods originally developed for shale reservoirs (Luffel and Guidry 1992;Guidry et al. 1996) are now, in some cases, being extended ...