2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(00)00025-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow through porous fences in thick boundary layers: comparisons between laboratory and numerical experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
26
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence herein we are going to focus the discussion on RNG and realizable k-e. From Figs. 3-8, we can observe that the RNG and realizable k-e turbulence models seem to have better performance for large porosities (f X 0.35), especially in the far lee field x/hbX4 and no great discrepancies are found between them. Most of the differences in the value of peak velocity ratio can be attributed to the computation of turbulent kinetic energy because mean velocity is well estimated as presented in Section 3 and as found by Packwood (2000). For these cases, it has been checked (not shown in this paper) that RNG k-e produces lower values of turbulent kinetic energy than realizable k-e, explaining the lower value of peak velocity ratio that is generally found.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Turbulence Models and Parameters Usedsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence herein we are going to focus the discussion on RNG and realizable k-e. From Figs. 3-8, we can observe that the RNG and realizable k-e turbulence models seem to have better performance for large porosities (f X 0.35), especially in the far lee field x/hbX4 and no great discrepancies are found between them. Most of the differences in the value of peak velocity ratio can be attributed to the computation of turbulent kinetic energy because mean velocity is well estimated as presented in Section 3 and as found by Packwood (2000). For these cases, it has been checked (not shown in this paper) that RNG k-e produces lower values of turbulent kinetic energy than realizable k-e, explaining the lower value of peak velocity ratio that is generally found.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Turbulence Models and Parameters Usedsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Some studies compare independently average and turbulent components (e.g. Packwood, 2000 found better results in numerical simulations for mean velocity than for turbulence parameters). However, in this work we intend to summarize the information of the shelter zone created in just one parameter defined as the peak velocity ratio:…”
Section: Evaluation Of Turbulence Models and Parameters Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The momentum equation is given by: where t is time, p is the mean pressure, u i u j are the Reynolds stresses and S i is a source term that is zero everywhere except inside the canopy. The k-蔚 turbulence closure model (k is it turbulent kinetic energy and 蔚 is its dissipation rate) or one of its variants was employed in the majority of previous studies of flow through windbreaks (e.g., Wilson and Mooney 1997;Packwood 2000;Santiago et al 2007) and for 3-D fences (Lin 2006;Li et al 2007;Bourdin and Wilson 2008) yielding reasonable agreement with experimental results. Therefore it was adopted in the present study.…”
Section: The Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross (1987) computed the pressure distribution around a single tree. Hagen et al (1981) as well as Wilson (1985), Wang and Takle (1995), Packwood (2000), Wang et al (2001), Wilson and Yee (2003), Santiago et al (2007) investigated, using a k-蔚 turbulence model, the effect of width, height, porosity and other parameters related to two-dimensional (2-D) fences. Bourdin and Wilson (2008) compared 2-D simulations of windbreaks and three-dimensional (3-D) simulations of homogeneous shelterbelts with experimental data, demonstrating good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand velocity profiles, which is an important aspect of sediment transport both in air and ocean, have been investigated by researchers through experiment [4][5][6][7] and the numerical simulation [13,14]. Most previous numerical studies [15,16] on porous fences excluded the presence of the sand grains and concentrated on wind velocity deficit of the wake behind the fences. In this paper, we focus on the shelter effect of particle velocity as the sand acts more directly than the wind in sand transportation control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%