2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2003.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow simulations in rotary volumetric pumps and compressors with the fictitious domain method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical models and finite element models [9][10][11][12][13] were established and then the motion of the valve disc was explored based on the U. Adolph motion differential equation [14,15]. Related experimental studies were mainly concerned about the fault diagnosis and signal processing of wearing parts of reciprocating pumps [16][17][18][19]. Pump parameters were generally acquired with pressure gauges and flow sensors installed on the pump suction or discharge pipe, and acceleration sensor mounted outside of the pump valve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models and finite element models [9][10][11][12][13] were established and then the motion of the valve disc was explored based on the U. Adolph motion differential equation [14,15]. Related experimental studies were mainly concerned about the fault diagnosis and signal processing of wearing parts of reciprocating pumps [16][17][18][19]. Pump parameters were generally acquired with pressure gauges and flow sensors installed on the pump suction or discharge pipe, and acceleration sensor mounted outside of the pump valve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values that are too low do not allow the flow to adjust rapidly enough to the motion of the body, while values that are too high may produce artificial stiffness. Moreover, for body motions that are not completely divergence-free a large pressure buildup is observed (see [57] for a case of lobe-pumps). A major improvement was put forward by Mohd-Yusof [44], who proposed to evaluate first the usual right-hand side for the flow equations at immersed points (or cells), and then add a force such that the velocity at the next timestep would satisfy the kinematic boundary condition v = v b .…”
Section: Kinetic Treatment Of Embedded or Immersed Objectsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The advantage of the simple linear form given by (1) is that a point-implicit integration of the velocities is possible, i.e. the stiffness of the large coefficient c 0 can be removed with no discernable increase in operations [57]. The main problem with force fields given by (1), (2) is the choice of the constants c 0 .…”
Section: Kinetic Treatment Of Embedded or Immersed Objectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations