2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2006)132:6(545)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Resistance of Rock Chutes with Protruding Boulders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step-pool nature-like fishway Most of hydraulic studies on SPNFs have focused on the evaluation of velocity, dissipated energy or friction factors (Pagliara and Chiavaccini, 2006;Wang and Hartlieb, 2011;Oertel and Schlenkhoff, 2012) and, there are no specific studies on discharge and discharge coefficients.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step-pool nature-like fishway Most of hydraulic studies on SPNFs have focused on the evaluation of velocity, dissipated energy or friction factors (Pagliara and Chiavaccini, 2006;Wang and Hartlieb, 2011;Oertel and Schlenkhoff, 2012) and, there are no specific studies on discharge and discharge coefficients.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bathurst (1985) was left to conclude that the complicated nature of the flow resistance processes, coupled with the lack of available data, currently prevent the development of a satisfactory practical method for predicting flow resistance in steep mountain rivers. More recently, Pagliara & Chiavaccini (2006) and Pagliara, Das, and Carnacina (2008) investigated flow resistance in steep chutes with large-scale roughness that comprised protruding boulders in some cases. Bed slope, relative submergence and boulder arrangement were systematically altered and a logarithmic expression for f was obtained and was shown to fit the available experimental data well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation generally used is the Manning-Strickler formula, which allows a simple calibration of the hydrodynamic models. The limitations of this formulation have been exposed in cases where the sizes of the roughness elements are similar to the water depth (strong confinement), torrential flow [1], vegetated beds [2,3], unsteady flow, or hyperconcentrated flow [4]. To mitigate these problems, many studies have sought to describe experimentally how friction changes with water depth, slope, or Froude number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%