2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-008-0309-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow rate-modified streaming effects in heterogeneous microchannels

Abstract: A general model based on the Onsager reciprocal relations is developed to study the streaming potential and streaming current in heterogeneous microchannels. The surface heterogeneities may be symmetrically or asymmetrically distributed parallel or perpendicular to the flow axis. Both streaming effects are modified by the flow rate through the heterogeneous channel, to eliminate the possible influence of electrokinetic flow on the streaming potential and streaming current measurements. Although they are still … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, two research conclusions have been reached concerning the relevance of streaming potentials to pressure loading rate or the non-proportional relationship between the them. The first one is that the fibrils in the canaliculus can disturb the flow state and the second one is that the electric environment can affect the ion distribution in double layer of micrchannels [13,14]. A hypothesis was proposed in literature [18] that the surface roughness of the microspace in bone might cause the fluid flow to become turbulent, which perhaps could affect the amplitude streaming potential in bone.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, two research conclusions have been reached concerning the relevance of streaming potentials to pressure loading rate or the non-proportional relationship between the them. The first one is that the fibrils in the canaliculus can disturb the flow state and the second one is that the electric environment can affect the ion distribution in double layer of micrchannels [13,14]. A hypothesis was proposed in literature [18] that the surface roughness of the microspace in bone might cause the fluid flow to become turbulent, which perhaps could affect the amplitude streaming potential in bone.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the microchannels of bone, the streaming potential and pressure gradient do not all follow the linear relationship, because the structure of bone microchannels is very complex and the channels inner surfaces are rough instead of smooth [12,13]. Due to the complexity of the structure of the microchannels it is very difficulty to measure the potentials distribution in the bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Corresponding to the streaming current, an electrical potential difference called the streaming potential is produced between the ends of the channel (Hunter 1981;Li 2004;Xuan 2008;Zhu et al 2008). The action of the streaming potential generates an electrical current called the conduction current in the opposite direction of the streaming current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lab-on-chip (LOC) systems (Felten et al 2008), flow of biomolecules in microchannels and microcapillaries (Waghmare and Mitra 2010a), porous media flows (Sbai and Azaroual 2011), chromatographic analysis (Bernate and Drazer 2011), and membrane separations (Das et al 2003;Bacchin et al 2011) are some of the examples of such systems in which particle transport in micro and nanochannels is ubiquitous. In most cases, the walls of these microchannels are physically and chemically heterogeneous which are either naturally occurring in these systems (Zhu et al 2008) or might be induced due to fabrication procedures (Rawool et al 2006). This study provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of how the transport of such suspended particles is affected in these microchannels due to the heterogeneities on the microchannel walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%