Several statements to the contrary notwithstanding, if it exists, the steady rectilinear shearing motion postulated by Han (1971), that is, (1) is most certainly a steady viscometric flow. Such a conclusion follows if the flow is viewed in the xl, x2, x3 coordinate system where the x1 coordinate surfaces are the cylinders j(x, y) = const., the x2 coordinate surfaces are the planes z = const. and the x3 coordinate surfaces are the cylinders g(x, y) = const. where o g * Of = 0. Thus, in the xl, x2, x3 coordinate system Equation ( 1) becomes 0 1 = 0, l)2 = XI, 0 3 = 0 and the motion is seen to belong to the steady viscometric class.The main issue, however, is whether or not a steady rectilinear shearing motion in a cylinder of rectangular cross section can be compatible with the dynamic equations which in view of Equation ( 1 ) take the special form Thus, if dv,/dx = 0 and x1 = y, x2 = z, x3 = x, Han's Equations (9) to (14) yield the material functions for rectilinear channel flow, and thereby for all steady viscometric flows as Should experiment support the postulate embodied in Equation ( l ) , then either the fluids are not of the class described by the Williams and Bird equation, or v,,,,, is sufficiently small that the secondary motion is not detectable. The latter is a likely happenstance in general inasmuch as every solution of Equation (2a) = dp/dz