2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28225-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow of CO2 from soil may not correspond with CO2 concentration in soil

Abstract: The relationship between CO2 flow from soil and soil CO2 concentration was investigated at 72 permanent sampling points at two forested post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czechia. Based on the entire data set (72 points sampled monthly during the growing season), CO2 flow from the soil was positively correlated with soil CO2 concentration. CO2 concentration in deeper soil layers was positively correlated with root biomass and negatively correlated with soil microbial respiration. In individual sampling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that C and N in flow paths are often much fresher than that of the matrix (Bundt et al, 2001a;Chabbi et al, 2009), we can infer that it is more labile and thus more susceptible to microbial utilization. Nonetheless, we are aware of only one study that has attempted to link CO 2 emissions and preferential flow (Hagedorn et al, 2015), although results from greenhouse gas studies seem to offer analogous conclusions (Jarecke et al, 2016;Frouz and Bujalský, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that C and N in flow paths are often much fresher than that of the matrix (Bundt et al, 2001a;Chabbi et al, 2009), we can infer that it is more labile and thus more susceptible to microbial utilization. Nonetheless, we are aware of only one study that has attempted to link CO 2 emissions and preferential flow (Hagedorn et al, 2015), although results from greenhouse gas studies seem to offer analogous conclusions (Jarecke et al, 2016;Frouz and Bujalský, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%