2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Instabilities in Solar Jets in Their Upstream and Downstream Regimes

Abstract: Using the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly 304Å images obtained from the Solar Dynamics Observatory, we study two jets which occurred during the M5.8 class flare on 2017 April 3 and the M5.5 class flare on 2016 July 23, respectively. During the M5.8 class flare, many vortex-like structures occurred in the upstream and downstream regimes of the associated jet. While the jet was ejected upwards to the corona, some dark material at its base flowed through a bright structure with a velocity of 110 km s −1 . The bounda… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors considered that the strong transverse velocity shear between the light bridge and the umbrae triggered the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI) resulting in the vortex structures, which then launched the jet in the vertical direction through magnetic reconnection or waves. To our knowledge, velocity shear larger than (it would be twice under certain assumptions) the local Alfvén speed (here ∼10 km s −1 in the photosphere) is needed for KHI to take place (Chandrasekhar 1961;Li et al 2019). Also, the KHI-induced vortices would form randomly at the boundary of flows (here the boundary is the edge of the light bridge).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These authors considered that the strong transverse velocity shear between the light bridge and the umbrae triggered the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI) resulting in the vortex structures, which then launched the jet in the vertical direction through magnetic reconnection or waves. To our knowledge, velocity shear larger than (it would be twice under certain assumptions) the local Alfvén speed (here ∼10 km s −1 in the photosphere) is needed for KHI to take place (Chandrasekhar 1961;Li et al 2019). Also, the KHI-induced vortices would form randomly at the boundary of flows (here the boundary is the edge of the light bridge).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And the KHI-induced vortices would form randomly at the boundary of flows (here is the edge of the light bridge). Considering the actual observations in both events reported in Yang et al (2019) and our study, we speculate that the vortices could be caused by the interaction between the large-scale, longlasting horizontal flows and some small-scale local convection cells (Toriumi et al 2015a) at some sites of the bridge during its developing phase, when the local convections are relatively stronger than that in the mature (or decaying) bridges. The diverging flows caused by the small-scale local convection would block the large-scale horizontal flows along the bridge filaments at some sites and squeeze them (also the magnetic fields) outwards, which then simultaneously intrude into the umbrae and form the vortex structures at both sides of the bridge.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These authors considered that the strong transverse velocity shear between the light bridge and the umbrae triggered the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI) resulting in the vortex structures, which then launched the jet in the vertical direction through magnetic reconnection or waves. To our knowledge, the velocity shear larger than (it would be twice under certain assumptions) local Alfvén speed (here is 10 km s −1 in the photosphere) is needed to make KHI take place (Chandrasekhar 1961;Li et al 2019). And the KHI-induced vortices would form randomly at the boundary of flows (here is the edge of the light bridge).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest is the basic flow of two fluids in par-allel infinite streams of different velocities, which is subject to Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (Helmholtz 1868;Kelvin 1871). Kelvin-Helmhotz instability has been intensively observed in the solar atmosphere at boundaries of rising coronal mass ejections (Ofman & Thompson 2011;Foullon et al 2011Foullon et al , 2013Möstl et al 2013), in solar prominences (Berger et al 2010;Ryutova et al 2010) and in jets (Zhelyazkov et al 2015(Zhelyazkov et al , 2018Li et al 2019). Various types of flows with smooth transverse profiles are also unstable in certain conditions (Drazin & Reid 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%