2020
DOI: 10.1002/lno.11542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow‐induced reconfiguration of aquatic plants, including the impact of leaf sheltering

Abstract: Many aquatic plants are flexible and bend in response to current. This reconfiguration can reduce the drag on the plant, both by reducing the frontal area and by creating a more streamlined shape. Previous studies have considered how the buoyancy and rigidity of a plant impact the drag reduction. This study additionally considered how reconfiguration impacts the sheltering between leaves on a plant and how this, in turn, impacts the drag on the plant. The posture and drag of single-stemmed, leaved plants were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the vertical profile of frontal area, Typha has a nonuniform distribution and Rotala has a uniform distribution. We note that under some flow conditions, aquatic plants exhibit reconfiguration (bending) in response to flow (e.g., Sand‐Jensen, 2003; Vogel, 1989) and that reconfiguration typically reduces the vegetation drag (e.g., de Langre et al, 2012; Fathi‐Maghadam & Kouwen, 1997; Harder et al, 2004) but can sometime increase the drag (Zhang & Nepf, 2020), both of which would impact vegetation‐generated turbulence. However, reconfiguration was not considered in this study, and for the flow and depth conditions considered here, the model plants did not reconfigure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the vertical profile of frontal area, Typha has a nonuniform distribution and Rotala has a uniform distribution. We note that under some flow conditions, aquatic plants exhibit reconfiguration (bending) in response to flow (e.g., Sand‐Jensen, 2003; Vogel, 1989) and that reconfiguration typically reduces the vegetation drag (e.g., de Langre et al, 2012; Fathi‐Maghadam & Kouwen, 1997; Harder et al, 2004) but can sometime increase the drag (Zhang & Nepf, 2020), both of which would impact vegetation‐generated turbulence. However, reconfiguration was not considered in this study, and for the flow and depth conditions considered here, the model plants did not reconfigure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was found to agree well with laboratory experiments, and the authors successfully reproduced the shelter effect originally noted in Seginer et al (1976). However, it did not include elastic forces, which Nepf (2012) experimentally demonstrated as one of the most important factors shaping the profile of seagrass (Zhang & Nepf, 2020). Dijkstra and Uittenbogaard (2010) applied a similar method as Abdelrhman (2007) by including the modulus of elasticity with good agreement to laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Boothroyd et al (2016) recently highlighted the importance of resolving plant seasonal morphological change on river flow dynamics; however, it has not remained easy to resolve both plant morphological detail and motion to date. Zhang and Nepf (2020) revealed that multiple leaves play a significant role in the sheltering. Through simple extensions of the leaf object model to allow for branching at selected DEM nodes, the approach presented in this study can be further developed for simulating a wider variety of plant forms, thereby allowing simulations that can capture hydrodynamic changes that occur over the full plant life cycle.…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boothroyd et al (2016) recently highlighted the importance of resolving plant seasonal morphological change on river flow dynamics; however, it has not remained easy to resolve both plant morphological detail and motion to date. Zhang and Nepf (2020) revealed that multiple leaves play a significant role in the sheltering. Through simple extensions of the leaf object model to allow for branching at selected DEM nodes, the approach presented in this study can be further developed for simulating a wider variety of plant forms, thereby allowing simulations that can capture hydrodynamic changes that occur over the full plant life cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was found to agree well with laboratory experiments, and the authors successfully reproduced the shelter effect originally noted in Seginer et al (1976). However, it did not include elastic forces, which Nepf (2012) experimentally demonstrated as one of the most important factors shaping the profile of seagrass (Zhang & Nepf, 2020). Dijkstra and Uittenbogaard (2010) applied a similar method as Abdelrhman (2007) by including the modulus of elasticity with good agreement to laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%