2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0645(00)00086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-induced aggregation of plankton at a front: a 2-D Eulerian model study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1 (and previous models such as [10] or [14]) is significant: when the organisms can be swept away by the plume-relative flow, the amplitude will not build up nearly as much.…”
Section: Physical Effects In Mass Baymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2.1 (and previous models such as [10] or [14]) is significant: when the organisms can be swept away by the plume-relative flow, the amplitude will not build up nearly as much.…”
Section: Physical Effects In Mass Baymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Frontal models of accumulation often have localized convergence but velocities extending far from the front (e.g., [10] have a − tanh(x) flow); these models argue that the accumulation will be modest if the front has localized velocities or lasts for times which are not tremendously long compared to L/|∇φ|.…”
Section: Appendix 2: Circular and Non-symmetric Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8] Many recent studies have suggested that plankton may aggregate along frontal boundaries due to the interaction between the physical flow field and plankton swimming [e.g., Tyler and Seliger, 1978;Olson and Backus, 1985;Franks, 1992Franks, , 1997Epstein and Beardsley, 2001;Hetland et al, 2002]. Although these reports are useful for a general understanding of the interactions between plankton and circulation, the spatial scales of frontal circulation are considerably smaller than those of coastal downwelling, and are thus not directly applicable to the case of coastal downwelling.…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%