2009
DOI: 10.2322/jjsass.57.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Field around NACA0012 Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers

Abstract: Measurements of velocity distributions immediately behind the trailing edge of NACA0012 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers were carried out to disclose the relation between the aerodynamic characteristics described in the previous report and the flow fields around the airfoil. A dead-air region due to laminar separation, which spoils the linear growth of lift, is created near the trailing edge of the airfoil at low angles of attack. A laminar separation bubble is observed in the boundary layer on the upper surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the Ishii airfoil, which is the main wing airfoil of this airplane, has a low Reynolds number dependency on its lift curves at Re greater than 33,000 and at angles of attack that were below the stall angle (about 9°). 12 Therefore, we concluded that these differences in Reynolds number had little influence on the following discussion.…”
Section: Flight Historymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note that the Ishii airfoil, which is the main wing airfoil of this airplane, has a low Reynolds number dependency on its lift curves at Re greater than 33,000 and at angles of attack that were below the stall angle (about 9°). 12 Therefore, we concluded that these differences in Reynolds number had little influence on the following discussion.…”
Section: Flight Historymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The cycle-averaged effective angles of attack at 50% and 75% spans from the root were 28.7 and 15.8 degrees, respectively. In the stationary airfoil cases, the stall angle of the NACA0012 at Re c = 1.0 × 10 5 was approximately 11 degrees [29]. the azimuth angle  varies from 0 degree to 180 degrees.…”
Section: Flow Conditions and Wind Turbine Blade Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The streamlines around the wake of the foil are compared with the experimental result of Ohtake et al (2009). Due to the time is not clarified for the given streamline in the experiment, the present result is chosen at the instant the flow is stable.…”
Section: Wake Flow Around An Airfoil At Re = 10 000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further verify the accuracy of the APR applied in the SPH method, the drag and lift coefficients acting on the airfoil in section 4.3 are compared with the experiment data of Ohtake et al (2009), and the results are shown in figures 17 and 18. It can be found that both the lift coefficient and drag coefficient regularly oscillate around the mean values of the experiment.…”
Section: Wake Flow Around An Airfoil At Re = 10 000mentioning
confidence: 99%