1995
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Distributions in Hollow Fiber Hemodialyzers Using Magnetic Resonance Fourier Velocity Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unexpectedly, the spiral arterial port's velocity field was somewhat different from the designer's intention to uniformly distribute BF into the fiber bundle, which has complex vortices and flow directions [13] . The most striking point of this study was that we found that vortices in arterial ports negatively affect the BF in fiber bundles that could not be quantitatively described by previous studies [5][6][7] . Using hemodynamic parameters (BF, BV, and MTT), three-dimensional perfusion properties of hemodialyzers with different arterial port configurations were analyzed quantitatively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unexpectedly, the spiral arterial port's velocity field was somewhat different from the designer's intention to uniformly distribute BF into the fiber bundle, which has complex vortices and flow directions [13] . The most striking point of this study was that we found that vortices in arterial ports negatively affect the BF in fiber bundles that could not be quantitatively described by previous studies [5][6][7] . Using hemodynamic parameters (BF, BV, and MTT), three-dimensional perfusion properties of hemodialyzers with different arterial port configurations were analyzed quantitatively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Agishi et al [4] collected local blood volume directly to show higher peripheral velocity, while Ronco et al [5] showed higher central BF distribution using computed tomography (CT). Other studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) showed uniform BF profiles in fiber bundles [6,7] . To resolve this controversy, BF in arterial ports and hemodynamics in fiber bundles should be considered simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…T 1 and T 2 -weighted MRI has been used to determine cell distribution in coaxial hollow ®ber bioreactors (Custer, 1988;Macdonald et al, 1998), whereas Fourier velocity zeugmatographic imaging has been applied to observe Starling¯ow in conventional hollow ®ber bioreactors (Hammer et al, 1990;Donoghue et al, 1992;Zhang et al, 1995) and axial¯ow in spirally-wound bioreactors (Flendrig et al, 1997). However, this is the ®rst report of quantifying axial¯ow rates by phase±contrast velocity-encoded MRI in a radial-¯ow hollow ®ber bioreactor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors used MRS/MRI techniques to test the performance of HFBs containing mammalian cells (Donoghue et al, 1992;Potter et al, 1998) and bioartificial livers (Macdonald et al, 1998). Others used these techniques to characterize the flow distribution in HFBs without cells (Hammer et al, 1990;Osuga et al, 1998;Zhang et al, 1995). However, to our knowledge, the only cell cultures which have been used to quantify the cellular transport of CAs by MRI are static cell cultures, such as cell pellets and cell monolayers (Aime et al, 2002;Schmalbrock et al, 2001).…”
Section: Mr-compatible Hfbmentioning
confidence: 99%