1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)01642-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometry crossmatch and kidney graft outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, both the patient and graft survival rates of ABO‐incompatible renal transplantation were almost identical with those of the ABO‐compatible group [2]. Currently, we can detect the presence of very weak anti‐donor antibodies before transplant operations by the FCXM technique [4]. FCXM is an effective method to pick up weakly pre‐sensitized patients who have been overlooked by ordinary LCT‐XM and might be at a high risk for severe acute humoral rejection under the usual immunosuppressive regimen [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fortunately, both the patient and graft survival rates of ABO‐incompatible renal transplantation were almost identical with those of the ABO‐compatible group [2]. Currently, we can detect the presence of very weak anti‐donor antibodies before transplant operations by the FCXM technique [4]. FCXM is an effective method to pick up weakly pre‐sensitized patients who have been overlooked by ordinary LCT‐XM and might be at a high risk for severe acute humoral rejection under the usual immunosuppressive regimen [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(1,2,(18)(19)(20) Moreover, posttransplant presence of DSA after restimulation of pre-viously sensitized memory population to donor antigens or due to formation of de novo DSA would increase the risk of acute and chronic rejection and decrease the allograft survival. (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) In this study, we have prospectively monitored 11 kidney transplant recipients for the presence and the formation of DSA by FCXM during 1 year after transplantation. In one patient, the antibody was detected only at 1 week posttransplant and disappeared at 1 month follow up serum; however, the other patient who already had low titer DSA undetectable by CDCXM before transplantation, the antibody titer increased and persisted until 1 month posttransplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) Posttransplant presence of DSA, due to restimulation of previously sensitized memory population to donor antigens or due to formation of de novo DSA, has been reported to increase the risk for acute and chronic rejection and decrease allograft survival. (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) FCXM has clear advantages compared to CDCXM in terms of sensitivity and laboratory practicability for simultaneous evaluation of T and B lymphocytes; it allows less subjective reading of results and repeated measurement of DSA, although it needs more or less to be measured by technical experts and its results interpreted by clinical experts. (17) In this study, we have measured the presence of pretransplant DSA in kidney transplant patients by CDCXM and FCXM and have continuously monitored the posttransplant DSA up to 1 year by FCXM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody is detected and measured by surface fluorescence of the lymphocytes. The FCXM can be one to three logs more sensitive than the AHG-CDC assay (depending on the serum/cell combination), with a major advantage that antibody reactivity can be independently and simultaneously evaluated on donor T and B lymphocytes [51,52]. In addition, because the FCXM is a semiquantitative measure of antibody binding, it can be less subjective than visual assessment of cell death in complementdependent assays.…”
Section: Learning From Present Transplantation Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%