2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20001101)41:3<209::aid-cyto8>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometry as a strategy to study the endosymbiosis of algae inParamecium bursaria

Abstract: Background The stable symbiotic association between Paramecium bursaria and algae is of interest to study such mechanisms in biology as recognition, specificity, infection, and regulation. The combination of algae‐free strains of P. bursaria, which have been recently established by treating their stocks of green paramecia with herbicide paraquat (Hosoya et al.: Zool Sci 12: 807–810, 1995), with the cloned symbiotic algae isolated from P. bursaria (Nishihara et al.: Protoplasma 203: 91–99, 1998), provides an ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a few reports of the literature describe FCM analysis of intact P. bursaria host cells using an instrument nozzle of a special size: 200 µm diameter [46]. In terms of morphological usability of microalgae for FCM, more exosymbiotic algae isolated from P. bursaria than the host cells have been studied and analyzed using FCM [5,6,47]. Many data obtained only from their algae, however, are entirely inadequate to clarify the mechanisms underlying endosymbiosis or the life cycle of endosymbionts remaining in P. bursaria because these exosymbiotic algae have already been disengaged from control by the host [7,34].…”
Section: Capillary Type Flow Cytometry Not Hydrodynamic Focusing Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, a few reports of the literature describe FCM analysis of intact P. bursaria host cells using an instrument nozzle of a special size: 200 µm diameter [46]. In terms of morphological usability of microalgae for FCM, more exosymbiotic algae isolated from P. bursaria than the host cells have been studied and analyzed using FCM [5,6,47]. Many data obtained only from their algae, however, are entirely inadequate to clarify the mechanisms underlying endosymbiosis or the life cycle of endosymbionts remaining in P. bursaria because these exosymbiotic algae have already been disengaged from control by the host [7,34].…”
Section: Capillary Type Flow Cytometry Not Hydrodynamic Focusing Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synchronous division between chloroplasts and each eukaryotic host cell is achieved in most algal species such as red and green algae, and in land plants in the following manner: each host cell dominantly regulates expression of the nucleus-encoded plastid division genes and proteins. Although organelles such as chloroplasts cannot become self-sustaining outside of an eukaryotic cell, exosymbiotic algae isolated from P. bursaria can proliferate independently from the host ciliate [5,25,47]. Endosymbiotic algae of P. bursaria, unlike organelles such as chloroplasts, are expected to be able to self-manage their cell cycle pace even if they remain in the host Paramecium.…”
Section: Cooperative Population Dynamics Of Endosymbiotic Algae In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbioses of Chlorella sp. with hydra and Paramecium bursaria are other examples (Rahat & Reich, 1984, 1985, Gerashchenko et al, 2000, in which green algae supply up to 69% of the host's caloric requirements when light is provided (Pardy & White, 1977). ''Back transfer'' of metabolites from food to endosymbiotic algae in the digestive cells of green hydra has also been demonstrated (Thorington & Margulis, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CELLS of a green paramecium, Paramecium bursaria , contain several hundred endosymbiotic algae. The organism has been used as a subject for research on endosymbiosis because host cell and endosymbiont can be separated and reconstructed from the partners (Gerashchenko et al 2000; Nishihara et al 1998; Reisser 1986, 1988; Reisser and Widowski 1992). Studies using isolates or reconstructed organisms have shown that the features of the symbiont differ from those of free‐living Chlorella species in several ways, including high maltose production (Brechignac and Wolf 1994) and maltose excretion to the host (Brown and Nielsen 1974), ability to re‐infect the endosymbiont‐free host cells (Reisser, Radunz, and Wiessner 1982; Takeda et al 1998), and susceptibility to viruses specific to Chlorella (Van Etten et al 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%