“…However, the technique has well‐known pitfalls and difficulties and can detect DNA aneuploidy only if a significant proportion of the tumour cells have lost or duplicated several chromosomes 3,4 . Other variables that have to be taken into consideration are the method of extraction and staining of the nuclei, delays in tissue fixation, intra‐ and interlaboratory variability, the minimum number and proportion of tumour cells analysed, the choice of the reference cell population, the programme for debris correction and, very importantly, tumour heterogeneity 3–12 . Furthermore, the interpretation of DNA histograms is not always straightforward, for there is a grey area between DNA diploidy and DNA aneuploidy and it can be difficult to define what constitutes a true diploid histogram and when aneuploidy begins.…”