1997
DOI: 10.1006/clin.1996.4323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-Cytometric Assessment ofin VivoCytokine-Producing Monocytes in HIV-Infected Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We wanted to confirm that the peptide autoepitopes ( Figure 6) were also relevant to unmanipulated CD4 T cells in PBMCs of patients with lupus. Flow cytometry for newly synthesized, intracellular cytokines is ideal for rapidly detecting antigen-specific responses and determining the frequency of CD4 T cells response to a particular epitope (19)(20)(21). Because autoimmune T cells are preactivated in vivo in patients with active disease, we found that activation markers, such as CD69, CD25, or CD79, were not as reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We wanted to confirm that the peptide autoepitopes ( Figure 6) were also relevant to unmanipulated CD4 T cells in PBMCs of patients with lupus. Flow cytometry for newly synthesized, intracellular cytokines is ideal for rapidly detecting antigen-specific responses and determining the frequency of CD4 T cells response to a particular epitope (19)(20)(21). Because autoimmune T cells are preactivated in vivo in patients with active disease, we found that activation markers, such as CD69, CD25, or CD79, were not as reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An equal number of events from every sample were analyzed. After doing preliminary studies with test antigens, such as tetanus toxoid, mumps, and candida, and taking into account previous experience in other systems (19)(20)(21), we considered a response to the nucleosomal antigens to be unequivocally positive when the frequency of positive cells was greater than 0.2% and the values were at least 2-fold higher than respective background values ("medium"; Figures 8 and 9). Repeat assays with…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations