1989
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90104-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric analysis of X-ray sensitivity in ataxia telangiectasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, p53 mutations, which confer deficiencies in the G 1 -S checkpoint, are correlated with enhanced spontaneous and UV-stimulated amplification of CAD genes (35,73). Cells cultured from patients with ataxia telangiectasia that are deficient in cell cycle arrest at both the G 1 -S and G 2 -M cell cycle checkpoints (7,49) also exhibit higher frequencies of chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations (37) and deletions (38), and chromosome end-to-end joining (41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, p53 mutations, which confer deficiencies in the G 1 -S checkpoint, are correlated with enhanced spontaneous and UV-stimulated amplification of CAD genes (35,73). Cells cultured from patients with ataxia telangiectasia that are deficient in cell cycle arrest at both the G 1 -S and G 2 -M cell cycle checkpoints (7,49) also exhibit higher frequencies of chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations (37) and deletions (38), and chromosome end-to-end joining (41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disorder is characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, oculocutaneous telangiectasia, immunodeficiency, chromosomal instability, radiosensitivity, and increased propensity to develop cancer (11). Exposure of A-T cells to ionizing radiation fails to cause initial delays at the G 1 /S and G 2 /M phase transitions (12)(13)(14). These cells exhibit radioresistant DNA synthesis (15)(16), and at longer times postirradiation they are irreversibly delayed in G 2 phase (9,17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiated AT cells also fail to show a normal delay in the transition from G1 to S, again suggesting a defect in a DNA damage-sensitive cell-cycle checkpoint (Friedberg et al 1995). Thus, mutations in the ATM gene appear to void a DNA damage-sensitive checkpoint that prevents cells with damaged chromosomes from entering mitosis (Rudolph and Latt 1989). Indeed, the cellular pathology associated with loss of ATM function suggests a defect in the ability of AT cells to halt their cell cycles in the presence of naturally occurring DNA damage (Murray 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%