1994
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.174.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Cytometric Analysis of the Cell Cycle of the Leukemic Cell Lines Treated with Etoposide and Cytosine Arabinoside.

Abstract: (2), 95-107 Effects of etoposide (VP-16) and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) on the cell cycle of HL-60 and THP-1 cells were studied by flow cytometry using the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)/DNA assay technique to investigate the efficacy of VP-16 for monocytic leukemia cells. VP-16 inhibited the proliferation of THP-1 cells more strongly than that of HL-60 cells at any concentrations used at 24 and 48 hr. VP-16 arrested HL-60 and THP-1 cells in the G2 /M phase and reduced them in the Go/G1 and early S phase at higher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, it seems that the presence of FBS rendered these cells more sensitive to the drug, likely altering the real capacity of these effectors to induce growth arrest and cell death. Moreover, regarding this aspect, it has been reported that primary leukemic cells showed an S-phase ranging from 20 to 45 %, which is the same range that we found in PL cultures, which may more likely resemble the kinetic behaviour of these primary cells (Ishiyama et al 1994). However, a proper dose-response curve was also observed for cells cultured in PL, indicating a preserved cell sensitivity to the drug, with differences that did not reach statistical significance at any dose-point, except for HL-60 at 0.005 and 0.01 lg/ml (p \ 0.05).…”
Section: Functional Assayssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, it seems that the presence of FBS rendered these cells more sensitive to the drug, likely altering the real capacity of these effectors to induce growth arrest and cell death. Moreover, regarding this aspect, it has been reported that primary leukemic cells showed an S-phase ranging from 20 to 45 %, which is the same range that we found in PL cultures, which may more likely resemble the kinetic behaviour of these primary cells (Ishiyama et al 1994). However, a proper dose-response curve was also observed for cells cultured in PL, indicating a preserved cell sensitivity to the drug, with differences that did not reach statistical significance at any dose-point, except for HL-60 at 0.005 and 0.01 lg/ml (p \ 0.05).…”
Section: Functional Assayssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We did not observe any modification of cell cycle distribution in the presence of these drugs. These two drugs were reported as inducing cell accumulation in G2+M [24,25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second serious side effect caused by etoposide is myelosuppression (Kobayashi & Ratain, 1994), which limits its application and may be a cause of the failure of chemotherapy. Etoposide inhibits proliferation of cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Ishiyama et al, 1994). The development of bone marrow hypoplasia induced by etoposide could also partially be attributed to the pro-oxidant action of its radicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%