2022
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.815152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Conditioning to Control the Effects of Inlet Swirl on Brush Seal Performance in Gas Turbine Engines

Abstract: When subject to highly swirling inlet flow, the bristles on the upstream face of a brush seal in gas turbine engines tend to slip circumferentially, which may lead to aeromechanical instability and seal failure. In this article, a new design of the front plate of brush seal, which mitigates this effect, is presented. Angled ribs on the upstream side of the front plate are used to reduce the swirl of the flow impacting on the bristle pack. The effects of the rib geometry, including angle of inclination and heig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the axial force is much larger than the orthogonal force, although both are critical in determining bristle blowdown and backing ring and shaft reaction force magnitudes. The force distribution observed here is comparable to previous CFD solutions [30][31][32]. The axial force increases from the fixed bristle end (normalized coordinates = 0) until reaching the maximum near the backing ring edge.…”
Section: Analyses With Cfd-based Aerodynamic Loadingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It can be seen that the axial force is much larger than the orthogonal force, although both are critical in determining bristle blowdown and backing ring and shaft reaction force magnitudes. The force distribution observed here is comparable to previous CFD solutions [30][31][32]. The axial force increases from the fixed bristle end (normalized coordinates = 0) until reaching the maximum near the backing ring edge.…”
Section: Analyses With Cfd-based Aerodynamic Loadingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It can be seen that the axial force is much larger than the orthogonal force, although both are critical in determining bristle blowdown and backing ring and shaft reaction force magnitudes. The force distribution observed here is comparable to previous CFD solutions [30][31][32]. The axial force increases from the fixed bristle end (normalized coordinates = 0) until reaching the maximum near the backing ring edge.…”
Section: Analyses With Cfd-based Aerodynamic Loadingsupporting
confidence: 87%