2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow characteristics of continuous shear drawing of high carbon steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fine (300 μm) meshes were applied on the surface area to inspect the complex deformation behavior. The friction factor of 0.1 was selected for numerical simulation according to the previous investigations [41][42][43]. Other parameters, e.g., drawing speed, die angle and reduction per pass, for numerical simulation were kept the same as the actual experimental conditions shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Analysis Of Stress Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine (300 μm) meshes were applied on the surface area to inspect the complex deformation behavior. The friction factor of 0.1 was selected for numerical simulation according to the previous investigations [41][42][43]. Other parameters, e.g., drawing speed, die angle and reduction per pass, for numerical simulation were kept the same as the actual experimental conditions shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Analysis Of Stress Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wire was assumed to be an isotropic material in this simulation, because hot-rolled steel was used as an initial specimen for the wire drawing test. A shear friction coefficient of 0.1 was selected for the wire-die interface; this was based on previous investigations [38][39][40]. To save on computational cost, half of the geometry was modeled because of the symmetrical constraints of the drawn wire.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the limitations in tension stress in drawing base methods, the processing of very long samples in materials with high formability (such as carbon steel) has been performed in the SD process. 141) In continuous processes such as ECAP conform, ECAR and ARB, since the pushing or dragging of the sample are performed by rollers and the sample is forced into the deformation area, there is no need for pull/push forces to the sample at both sides of the deformation zone. Therefore, the workability is almost higher than the earlier example and it could produce a very long sample.…”
Section: Sizementioning
confidence: 99%