2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.034515
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory

Abstract: A Markov chain update scheme using a machine-learned flow-based generative model is proposed for Monte Carlo sampling in lattice field theories. The generative model may be optimized (trained) to produce samples from a distribution approximating the desired Boltzmann distribution determined by the lattice action of the theory being studied. Training the model systematically improves autocorrelation times in the Markov chain, even in regions of parameter space where standard Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
251
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(277 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
251
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is true, in particular, for the lattice formulation of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [21][22][23], which enables calculations of nonperturbative phenomena arising from the standard model of particle physics. Recently, there has been progress in the development of flow-based generative models which can be trained to directly produce samples from a given probability distribution; early success has been demonstrated in theories of bosonic matter, spin systems, molecular systems, and for Brownian motion [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. This progress builds on the great success of flow-based approaches for image, text, and structured object generation [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], as well as non-flow-based machine learning techniques applied to sampling for physics [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is true, in particular, for the lattice formulation of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [21][22][23], which enables calculations of nonperturbative phenomena arising from the standard model of particle physics. Recently, there has been progress in the development of flow-based generative models which can be trained to directly produce samples from a given probability distribution; early success has been demonstrated in theories of bosonic matter, spin systems, molecular systems, and for Brownian motion [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. This progress builds on the great success of flow-based approaches for image, text, and structured object generation [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], as well as non-flow-based machine learning techniques applied to sampling for physics [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature enables training the flow model, i.e., optimizing the function f, by minimizing the distance between the model probability density qðU 0 Þ and the desired density pðU 0 Þ using a chosen metric. Any deviation from the true distribution due to an imperfect model can be corrected by a number of techniques; in this Letter, we apply independence Metropolis sampling [26]. (Reweighted observables can also be used [59,60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would mirror the efficiency gained for imaginary time lattice simulations through Hybrid Monte Carlo or Metropolis with local update. An interesting option is to implement a machine learning algorithm to better estimate the thimble [53,54]. Another is to perhaps adapt a complex Langevin algorithm [46,55,56] to explore along a thimble rather than in the entire complexified manifold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other neural network approaches to density estimation have been studied in high energy physics. Such methods include Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) , autoencoders [54,66], physically-inspired networks [67,68], and flows [69,70]. GANs are efficient for sampling from a density and are thus promising for accelerating slow simulations, but they do not provide an explicit representation of the density itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%