2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29828-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-Based Combinatorial Chance Constraints

Abstract: Abstract. We study stochastic variants of flow-based global constraints as combinatorial chance constraints. As a specific case study, we focus on the stochastic weighted alldifferent constraint. We first show that determining the consistency of this constraint is NP-hard. We then show how the combinatorial structure of the alldifferent constraint can be used to define chance-based filtering, and to compute a policy. Our propagation algorithm can be extended immediately to related flow-based constraints such a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the Kth largest m-tuple problem was used by Cire et al [16] to show NP-hardness of another probabilistic problem, namely determining whether a so-called "chance-alldifferent constraint" has a solution. This is a weighted extension of stochastic constraint programming.…”
Section: Further Probabilistic Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the Kth largest m-tuple problem was used by Cire et al [16] to show NP-hardness of another probabilistic problem, namely determining whether a so-called "chance-alldifferent constraint" has a solution. This is a weighted extension of stochastic constraint programming.…”
Section: Further Probabilistic Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a weighted extension of stochastic constraint programming. Cire et al [16] remarked: "Also, we are not aware if the problem of deciding whether there exists a feasible solution to chance-alldifferent is in NP." But this seems unlikely, as their reduction combined with Theorem 3 proves PP-hardness of this problem.…”
Section: Further Probabilistic Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%