DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-6953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floristic analysis of central Iowa woodlands, and comparison of reproduction and regeneration in common and restricted herbaceous species

Abstract: This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter ^ce, while others may t)e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print t)leedthrough, substarxjard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproducti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used plant species data from previously conducted studies (Mabry, 2000;Gerhardt and Foster, 2002). In each study, data included measures of canopy trees, understory trees, shrubs, and all vascular non-woody understory or ground-layer species.…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used plant species data from previously conducted studies (Mabry, 2000;Gerhardt and Foster, 2002). In each study, data included measures of canopy trees, understory trees, shrubs, and all vascular non-woody understory or ground-layer species.…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w15183228/s1, Table S1: Location and the hydrological station; Table S2: Plant functional traits and ecosystem processes and service. References [52][53][54] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%