2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information &Amp; Communication Technology (RTEICT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/rteict.2017.8256671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floriculture classification using simple neural network and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rates for dead/alive plant detection for the LiDAR and light curtain sensors were 93.75% and 94.16%, respectively. Additionally, a few other studies have reported the application of machine vision approaches using different machine learning and deep learning methodologies for detecting and classifying different flower nurseries [ 71 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Sensing and Automation Technologies For Ornamental Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rates for dead/alive plant detection for the LiDAR and light curtain sensors were 93.75% and 94.16%, respectively. Additionally, a few other studies have reported the application of machine vision approaches using different machine learning and deep learning methodologies for detecting and classifying different flower nurseries [ 71 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Sensing and Automation Technologies For Ornamental Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aakif & Khan in 2015 used an ANN with a unique shape feature, morphological features, and Fourier descriptors and achieved the highest accuracy of 96% [9]. The Shape Defining Feature (SDF) of calculating the shape feature involved calculating gradients on the edge of the leaf [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original classification of fresh-cut flowers is done manually [1], but owing to human subjectivity, visual fatigue, experience differences, and classification efficiency, it is difficult to meet the requirements of standardized production of freshcut flowers and cannot guarantee the efficiency, consistency, and stability of grade classification and quality evaluation of fresh-cut flowers. To effectively reduce the labor intensity of workers, manual intervention, and the loss of post-harvest processing of fresh-cut flowers, achieve high efficiency and quality, and meet the demands of automatic processing and classification line of fresh-cut flowers, it is necessary to use automatic processing and classification systems [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) is the result of the horizontal flipping operation on the original image, image(2) is the result of the vertical flipping operation on the original image, image (3) is the result of the horizontal and vertical flipping operations on the original image, image (4) is the result of a 90 °rotation operation on the original image, image (5) is the result of adding random salt and pepper noise to the original image, image (6) is the result of randomly adding Gaussian noise to the original image, image(7) is the result of the blurring operation on the original image, and image (8) is the result of changing the brightness of the original image.Because of the different sizes of the minimum rectangular boxes used for capture and cropping, the sizes of the images after cropping were different. To facilitate the subsequent model training and testing, the samples were adjusted to a uniform size, and a 224×224 3C flower dataset with 3906 samples was obtained after data augmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%