1999
DOI: 10.1086/303249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral Symmetry and Its Influence on Variance in Flower Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
45
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several comparisons of variation in floral traits have demonstrated that bilateral flowers were less variable in size than radial flowers (Armbruster et al 1999;Wolfe & Krstolic 1999;Ushimaru et al 2007;Herrera et al 2008;van Kleunen et al 2008), supporting the PMSS hypothesis. However, it remains unclear whether variance in the flower size is associated with pollinator diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Several comparisons of variation in floral traits have demonstrated that bilateral flowers were less variable in size than radial flowers (Armbruster et al 1999;Wolfe & Krstolic 1999;Ushimaru et al 2007;Herrera et al 2008;van Kleunen et al 2008), supporting the PMSS hypothesis. However, it remains unclear whether variance in the flower size is associated with pollinator diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A few other studies have found similar trends. Wolfe and Krstolic (1999) and Ushimaru et al (2006) found that plant species with radially symmetrical flowers (which supposedly experienced generalized pollination) were more variable in size than species with bilaterally symmetrical flowers (which supposedly experienced specialized pollination). Similarly, Armbruster et al (1999) and Meng et al (2008) found lower variation in species with specialized pollination in comparison to species with generalized pollination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of factors that can affect the variability of traits may explain the varying support for Berg's hypothesis provided by empirical studies of variational and covariational patterns in vegetative and reproductive parts in flowering plants (Diggle 1992;Waitt & Levin 1993, 1998Conner & Sterling 1995Armbruster et al 1999;Wolfe & Krstolic 1999;Magwene 2001;Herrera et al 2002;Juenger et al 2005;Brock & Weinig 2007;Hansen, Pe´labon & Armbruster 2007;Perez-Barrales, Arroyo & Armbruster 2007;Chalcoff, Ezcurra & Aizen 2008;Ordano et al 2008). Indeed, while reproductive traits generally show lower phenotypic variation than vegetative traits (Fenster 1991;Cresswell 1998;Herrera 2001;Chalcoff, Ezcurra & Aizen 2008), this pattern is not restricted to species with a specialized pollinator (Armbruster et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%