2020
DOI: 10.1002/fedr.201900011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral Studies in Octomeria R. BR. (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae)

Abstract: Octomeria is a well‐represented basal genus in the subtribe Pleurothallidinae, the main myophile group of the Orchidaceae. The systematics of the genus is based in leaf shape and degree of connation of sepals. In this study, we analyse comparatively the flower micromorphology of 15 species through light microscopy, histochemical tests and scanning electron microscopy, including most of the infrageneric groups proposed for the genus. The epidermal structures of sepals and petals are very similar, with oblong or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Octomeria is mainly characterized by being selfincompatible (dos Santos et al 2020). Luer (2011) published the first cleistogamous species of the genus from Ecuador, naming it O. werneri.…”
Section: Octomeria Panguiensismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Octomeria is mainly characterized by being selfincompatible (dos Santos et al 2020). Luer (2011) published the first cleistogamous species of the genus from Ecuador, naming it O. werneri.…”
Section: Octomeria Panguiensismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on some studies of the pollination systems in Pleurothallidinae, it has been possible to determine that the orchid species within the subtribe are generally self-incompatible (Borba et al 2001). According to the recent phylogenetic studies of Pleurothallidinae, Octomeria together with Atopoglossum, Brachionidium, and Sansonia form an early diverging group called Octomeria affinity (Karremans 2016) and is believed to be mostly self-incompatible and myophilic (Karremans & Díaz-Morales 2019, dos Santos et al 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%