2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00365.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral integration, phenotypic covariance structure and pollinator variation in bumblebee-pollinated Helleborus foetidus

Abstract: By analysing patterns of phenotypic integration and multivariate covariance structure of five metric floral traits in nine Iberian populations of bumblebee‐pollinated Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae), this paper attempts to test the general hypothesis that pollinators enhance floral integration and selectively modify phenotypic correlations between functionally linked floral traits. The five floral traits examined exhibited significant phenotypic integration at all populations, and both the magnitude and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
163
2
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
7
163
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The reproductive ecology of H. foetidus in these areas has been described (27)(28)(29)(30). Plants consist of one or a few ramets, each of which produces a single terminal inflorescence after 3-5 seasons of vegetative growth and subsequently dies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The reproductive ecology of H. foetidus in these areas has been described (27)(28)(29)(30). Plants consist of one or a few ramets, each of which produces a single terminal inflorescence after 3-5 seasons of vegetative growth and subsequently dies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation for the marked heterogeneity among taxa in levels of integration, and the unexpectedly weak integration observed in the flowers of some taxa, is that flowers are not single fully integrated units. Rather, the multiple functions of the flower are each performed by distinct suites of integrated characters that share a common function but are independent of sets of structures with alternative functions, that is, floral variation/covariation may be modular [46][47][48][49]. Independence among functional modules would reduce measures of overall integration for the flower as a whole.…”
Section: Intra-floral Integration and Modularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herrera et al [49] took a different approach to the question of modularity. They examined intra-floral modularity for Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) by comparing the observed correlation structure with alternative patterns predicted by hypotheses of complete integration versus independence of sets of characters.…”
Section: Intra-floral Integration and Modularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions to estimate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for corrected INT. Values were considered to represent significant integration if their 95% CIs did not include zero and significance of differences in integration between floral forms and trait compartments was assessed by examining overlap in CIs [20].…”
Section: (D) Assessing Trait Divergence Between Floral Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%