2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-011-9146-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral epidermal structure and flower orientation: getting to grips with awkward flowers

Abstract: This is a copy of the author's accepted version of this manuscript, and the definitive published version in Arthropod-Plant Interactions may have changed slightly in response to editing. This version is made available on the University of Bristol's repository, complying with Springer's policy on self-archiving (7 th April 2008). The original article, with full details of citation, is available at springerlink.com, at http://www.springerlink.com/content/v81t25t4421126n2/ .-2 - AbstractThe petal epidermis has be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Rands et al . ). The petal–insect interactions have important ecological and evolutionary implications, as insect leg structure is closely related to epidermal surface characteristics, providing landing and locomotion safety on the petals (Whitney & Federle ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Rands et al . ). The petal–insect interactions have important ecological and evolutionary implications, as insect leg structure is closely related to epidermal surface characteristics, providing landing and locomotion safety on the petals (Whitney & Federle ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Rands et al . ; Alcorn et al ). Christensen & Hansen (1988) found conical cells in all of the melittophilous flowers they analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, we examined the floral epidermal cell surfaces of Phalaenopsis species (Figure 1; Supplementary Figure S1); the tissues of sepals and petals had a papillae shape with a protuberance on the smooth epidermal surface, whereas the lip harbored numerous nanoridges on the epidermal surface. The biological function of nanoridges on the floral organs for pollinator attraction has been linked with the unique visual and tactile signals they produce (Whitney et al, 2009;Prüm et al, 2011;Rands et al, 2011;Whitney et al, 2011b;Prüm et al, 2012;Kourounioti et al, 2013;Prüm et al, 2013;Adachi et al, 2015;Moyroud et al, 2017).…”
Section: Distinct Sculpture On the Lip Epidermal Surface Reveals The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in many plants, sepal and petal epidermal cells are covered with various density and orientation of nanoridges (Jeffree, 2006). These structures on the surface of sepal and petal epidermal cells are believed to attract pollinators and enhance pollination success through visual signals (Whitney et al, 2009;Whitney et al, 2011b;Kourounioti et al, 2013;Moyroud et al, 2017) and act as tactile signals affecting pollinator movement (Prüm et al, 2011;Rands et al, 2011;Prüm et al, 2012;Prüm et al, 2013;Adachi et al, 2015). Moreover, cell surface cuticle structures can strengthen cells and thereby function many ways in plant development as well as survival and defense in unfavorable environments, such as under biotic or abiotic stress (e.g., dehydration, pathogens, UV light, frost, and insect attacks) (Koch et al, 2008;Koch et al, 2009a;Koch et al, 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, downward‐facing flowers have been subsequently documented in a number of insect‐pollinated plants (Ushimaru & Hyodo ; Ushimaru, Kawase & Imamura ; Ushimaru et al . ; Rands, Glover & Whitney ). Nevertheless, the prevalence of insect pollination of pendent flowers in different geographical regions is substantially lower than that of hummingbird pollination (Aizen ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%