1997
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral Biology, Pollination, Pistil Receptivity, and Pollen Tube Growth of Teak (Tectona grandisLinn f.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the amount of pollen per anther and flowerlet was estimated based on the pollen number in the 0.1 ml of liquid. The technique was modified based on previous researches [15,35].…”
Section: Pollen Production and Structure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the amount of pollen per anther and flowerlet was estimated based on the pollen number in the 0.1 ml of liquid. The technique was modified based on previous researches [15,35].…”
Section: Pollen Production and Structure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-incompatibility could act in the stigma, style or ovary, or even during development of the embryo [59]. A number of the pollen tubes in self-pollinated flowers or afflicted with gametophytic self-incompatibility terminated in the style [58], but most were inhibited in the ovary [35]. A different mechanism could perhaps explain the phenomenon in cases of gametophytic self-incompatibility [60,61].…”
Section: Pollen-tube Growth and Weak Self-incompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species grows naturally in a wide range of environmental conditions from dry places with only 500 mm annual rain up to areas with 5000 mm-but optimum conditions are in areas having between 1200 and 2500 mm rainfall annually (Kaosa-ard 1981). Teak is a light-demanding (Soerianegara and Lemmens 1994), mainly insect-pollinated and outcrossing species (Bryndum and Hedegart 1969;Hedegart 1973;Kjaer and Suangtho 1995;Kertadikara and Prat 1995a;Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural provenances of teak exhibit differences in phenology (Bedell 1989;Kaosa-ard 1999), floral biology and seed biology Vasudeva 2002, 2003;Nagarajan et al 1996;Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997a;Vasudeva et al 2004). Teak fruit size, weight and viability vary among natural provenances and seed production according to the ecological conditions (Gupta and Pattanath 1975;Indira 2003;Kaosa-ard 1986;Mathew and Vasudeva 2003;Nagarajan et al 1996;Palupi and Owens 1998;Sivakumar et al 2002;Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%