Floodlight vs Onos Dalam Unjuk Kerja

Kartadie, Rikie; Panggayuh, Vertika

doi:10.29100/jipi.v4i2.1409

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Tujuan dari dibentukan arsitektur SDN adalah untuk mempermudah dalam memanajemen jaringan, mengurangi biaya pengoperasian jaringan [2]. Unjuk kerja kontroler dengan parameter Quality of Service menjadi salah satu cara dalam menentukan performansi sebuah kontroler [3].…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbandingan Kontroler POX, Ryu dan ONOS Pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan Topologi Linear

Nuraeni¹,

Wahyudi²,

Iryani³

2022

J. Telecomm. Electr. Control Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrak Software defined network merupakan konsep baru yang memisahkan data plane dengan control plane. Kontroler menjadi suatu hal yang penting dalam membangun arsitektur software defined network, sehingga dibutuhkan informasi terkait performansi kontroler untuk mengetahui tingkat kemampuan suatu kontroler, bebarapa kontroler yang ada diantaranya POX, Ryu dan ONOS. Pada penenelitan ini menggunakan topologi jaringan linear yang menggunakan 10 switch dan 10 host, 12 switch dan 12 host, 14 switch dan 14 host dan 16 Switch 16 host pada background traffic 50 Mbps hingga 200 Mbps. Dari pengujian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa kenaikan nilai troughput, delay dan jitter berbanding lurus dengan meningkatnya jumlah switch, kontroler POX memiliki performa terbaik dibandingkan dengan kontroler Ryu dan ONOS dengan nilai troughput yang didapatkan sebesar 5.139,456 Kbits/sec hingga 5.142,139 Kbits/sec, untuk nilai delay yang didapatkan sebesar 0,078 ms hingga 0,110 ms sedangkan untuk nilai jitter diperoleh 0,037 ms hingga 0,070 ms. Abstract Software defined network is a new concept that separates the data plane from the control plane. The controller is an important thing in building a software defined network architecture, so information regarding controller performance is needed to determine the level of capability of a controller, some of the existing controllers include POX, Ryu and ONOS. This research uses a linear network topology that uses 10 switches and 10 host, 12 switches and 12 host, 14 switches and 14 host and 16 switches and 16 host on 50 Mbps to 200 Mbps background traffic. From this test, the results show that the increase in throughput, delay and jitter values is directly proportional to the increase in the number of switches, the POX controller has the best performance compared to the Ryu and ONOS controllers with the throughput value obtained from 5,139,456 Kbits/sec to 5,142,139 Kbits/sec. , for the delay value obtained is 0.078 ms to 0.110 ms while the jitter value is obtained from 0.037 ms to 0.070 ms.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbandingan Kontroler POX, Ryu dan ONOS Pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan Topologi Linear

Nuraeni¹,

Wahyudi²,

Iryani³

2022

J. Telecomm. Electr. Control Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In his paper, Goswami is contributing to the evaluation of the performance and the scalability of the ONOS controller by taking many scenarios which are experimented on Mininet, ONOS Controller, Docker, and iPerf [10]. Kartadie and Panggayuh in their research, present a test on Floodlight and ONOS controllers, where the test results show that the Floodlight controller is more stable than ONOS in terms of overcoming switch and host loads [11] . Pratama and Wikantyasa on their research, implementing and analyzing the simulation of Quality of Service (QoS) and performance device OpenFlow switch using ONOS as controller, to monitor the device performance and iperf3 as a Quality of Service (QoS) testing [12] Halomoan, et al, explained in their research about the operational Open Flow controller using the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Implementation of SDN IP Based on Open Network Operating System and Border Gateway Protocol

Pratama

2021

Bulletin of Comp. Sci. Electr. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of computer network technology in the form of Software Defined Networking (SDN), provides many facilities for users to be able to develop network control applications, which can separate the data plane function from the control plane. The existence of this separation on routers and switches makes it easy for developers to centrally develop software and devices according to what is needed by users. However, there were obstacles to implementing SDN on IP networks in a short time. For this reason, it is necessary to implement SDN in stages by adding SDN to the existing IP network in the form of SDN IP, so that SDN can be connected and exchange routing information autonomously. This study focuses on the design and implementation of SDN IP using the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) on the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The results show that the design and implementation of SDN IP based on ONOS and BGP can be done well, where SDN can connect and exchange routing information with the Autonomous System (AS) native BGP-based network. Key word(s): Autonomous System (AS) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Open Network Operating System (ONOS) Software-Defined Networking (SDN) SDN IP

show abstract

Floodlight vs Onos Dalam Unjuk Kerja

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

Perbandingan Kontroler POX, Ryu dan ONOS Pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan Topologi Linear

Perbandingan Kontroler POX, Ryu dan ONOS Pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network (SDN) Menggunakan Topologi Linear

Design and Implementation of SDN IP Based on Open Network Operating System and Border Gateway Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About