2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-020-00997-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak discharge was calculated using the SWAT model, and the peak discharge was included as one of the indications. The General Circulation Models (GCM) data were used to forecast future rainfall, while Landsat pictures were used to create land use and land (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021) (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021) (Pathak et al, 2020), (Hoque et al, 2019) (Mavhura et al, 2017), (Terti et al, 2015) (Eidsvig et al, 2014), (Zhang, 2009) Physical vulnerability Interdependency analysis, indicator methodology, decision-making trial method., Indicator based approach, morphometric parameters were derived from SRTM DEM data using (GIS), Weighted Sum Approach (WSA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and an Integrated Approach (IA), GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach, Geospatial Indicator-Based Approach and Participatory Analytical Hierarchy Process, Flood generating factors: slope, elevation, land use/land cover, drainage density, rainfall, and soil types were rated and collected to mark out flood vulnerability zones using (GIS), Regression and GIS conditioning factors include digital elevation model (DEM), Pearson's correlation, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity analyses (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021), (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021), (Vignesh et al, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Desalegn and Mulu, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Sami et al, 2020), (D'Ayala et al, 2020), (Chuang et al, 2020), (Yin et al, 2019), (Hoque et al, 2019), Sajjad, 2019), Hübl et al, 2016), (Al-Juaidi et al, 2018), (Hazarika et al, 2018), (Walliman et al, 2012) and, (Mehebub et al, 2015) Environmental…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and A Brief Discussion On P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peak discharge was calculated using the SWAT model, and the peak discharge was included as one of the indications. The General Circulation Models (GCM) data were used to forecast future rainfall, while Landsat pictures were used to create land use and land (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021) (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021) (Pathak et al, 2020), (Hoque et al, 2019) (Mavhura et al, 2017), (Terti et al, 2015) (Eidsvig et al, 2014), (Zhang, 2009) Physical vulnerability Interdependency analysis, indicator methodology, decision-making trial method., Indicator based approach, morphometric parameters were derived from SRTM DEM data using (GIS), Weighted Sum Approach (WSA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and an Integrated Approach (IA), GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach, Geospatial Indicator-Based Approach and Participatory Analytical Hierarchy Process, Flood generating factors: slope, elevation, land use/land cover, drainage density, rainfall, and soil types were rated and collected to mark out flood vulnerability zones using (GIS), Regression and GIS conditioning factors include digital elevation model (DEM), Pearson's correlation, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity analyses (Singh and Pandey, 2021), (Hosseini et al, 2021), (Nazeer and Bork, 2021), (Hussain et al, 2021), (Vignesh et al, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Desalegn and Mulu, 2021), (Usman Kaoje et al, 2021), (Sami et al, 2020), (D'Ayala et al, 2020), (Chuang et al, 2020), (Yin et al, 2019), (Hoque et al, 2019), Sajjad, 2019), Hübl et al, 2016), (Al-Juaidi et al, 2018), (Hazarika et al, 2018), (Walliman et al, 2012) and, (Mehebub et al, 2015) Environmental…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and A Brief Discussion On P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a single model, different vulnerability elements can be tested together. Social vulnerability is specifically connected to the failure of any party or society to deal with the repercussions of any occurrence (Wahab and Muhamad Ludin, 2018) (Wang et al, 2019) (Vignesh et al, 2021). The poorer part of the population is more vulnerable to flooding and other natural disasters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drainage density can be defined as the length of river channels per unit area of the basin, and it represents flow accumulation pathways (Arora et al 2019). The drainage network map of the study area is generated from DEM data using the hydrology tools, and drainage density is calculated by the line density tool in GIS (Vignesh et al 2021).…”
Section: Drainage Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floods give rise to different landforms like erosional and depositional landforms. The geomorphological data is obtained from the Bhukosh-Geological Survey of India (GSI) (https://bhukosh.gsi.gov.in/Bhukosh/MapViewer.aspx), and classified into (a) structural hills, (b) denudational hills, (c) alluvial plains, (d) pediplain, and (e) floodplain (Vignesh et al 2021).…”
Section: Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP [3,12,15,16,[20][21][22]27,29,32,35,36,43,47,48,63,64,75,82,[85][86][87]89,90,92,94,97,98,102,103,105,108,113,114,116,[118][119][120][121][122]124,128,133] [ 42,65,74,96,101,111,117,123] [30] [17,…”
Section: Preparedness Recovery Responsementioning
confidence: 99%