2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-017-0520-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood pulse induced changes in isotopic niche and resource utilization of consumers in a Mexican floodplain system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trophic structure of the macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages was described for each site for the dry and wet seasons separately using Layman's Bayesian stable isotope‐based community‐wide metrics (Layman et al., ; R Development Core Team, ). Because not all species occurred at all sites, macroinvertebrate FFGs and fish trophic guilds were used to run the analyses (de Castro et al., ; Sepúlveda‐Lozada, Saint‐Paul, Mendoza‐Carranza, Wolff, & Yáñez‐Arancibia, ). The five Layman's community metrics considered were as follows: (a) δ 13 C range (CR), which depicts basal source diversity; (b) δ 15 N range (NR), which describes trophic length; (c) the mean distance to centroid (CD), which is the mean Euclidean distance of each assemblage component to the centroid and a measure of community niche width (related to trophic diversity) and species spacing; (d) the mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND), which is the mean Euclidean distance from each group to its nearest neighbour in the δ 13 C‐δ 15 N biplot space, an estimate of density and clustering of species within the community; and (e) the standard deviation of the nearest neighbour distance (SDNND), which measures the uniformity (evenness) of the groups’ spacing in the biplot space (Jackson et al., , ; Layman et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trophic structure of the macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages was described for each site for the dry and wet seasons separately using Layman's Bayesian stable isotope‐based community‐wide metrics (Layman et al., ; R Development Core Team, ). Because not all species occurred at all sites, macroinvertebrate FFGs and fish trophic guilds were used to run the analyses (de Castro et al., ; Sepúlveda‐Lozada, Saint‐Paul, Mendoza‐Carranza, Wolff, & Yáñez‐Arancibia, ). The five Layman's community metrics considered were as follows: (a) δ 13 C range (CR), which depicts basal source diversity; (b) δ 15 N range (NR), which describes trophic length; (c) the mean distance to centroid (CD), which is the mean Euclidean distance of each assemblage component to the centroid and a measure of community niche width (related to trophic diversity) and species spacing; (d) the mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND), which is the mean Euclidean distance from each group to its nearest neighbour in the δ 13 C‐δ 15 N biplot space, an estimate of density and clustering of species within the community; and (e) the standard deviation of the nearest neighbour distance (SDNND), which measures the uniformity (evenness) of the groups’ spacing in the biplot space (Jackson et al., , ; Layman et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong influence of river inputs on the trophic status and hydrological diversity evidenced in the present work was consistent with the Flood Pulse Concept (FPC) which defines flood pulse as the major driving force in wetland systems (Junk and Wantzen 2004). This concept was recently linked in Terminos Lagoon to an adaptive diversification in resource use by consumers (Sepúlveda-Lozada et al 2017), with periods of high river inputs resulting in higher trophic diversification and lower trophic redundancy, and conversely. Shifts in hydrological diversity and trophic status leading to a strong variability in food supply have been seen to impact entire communities in terms of density, diversity, and physiological state (Wantzen et al 2002;Junk and Wantzen 2004;Abrantes et al 2014).…”
Section: Short-to Long-term Potential Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority are marine species that enter the lagoon cyclically or sporadically, in addition to estuarine and freshwater species that can live in euryhaline conditions (Yáñez-Arancibia et al 1993). Recent studies indicate that fish diversity in mangrove habitats is composed of 18 (Amador-del Ángel et al 2015) up to 34 species, in the area of mangrove and seagrass (Sepúlveda-Lozada et al 2017). However, this ecosystem is under threat due to anthropogenic activities and natural phenomena (Soto-Galera et al 2010, Zaldívar-Jiménez et al 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%