2018
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201810.0098.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning, Literature Review

Abstract: Floods are among the most destructive natural disasters, which are highly complex to model. The research on the advancement of flood prediction models has been contributing to risk reduction, policy suggestion, minimizing loss of human life and reducing the property damage associated with floods. To mimic the complex mathematical expressions of physical processes of floods, during the past two decades, machine learning (ML) methods have highly contributed in the advancement of prediction systems providing bett… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 146 publications
(172 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most developing countries, because of the limited data sources, realistic situations favour black box models (Latt & Wittenberg, 2014). Any relation between a number of dependent and independent variables (inputs and outputs, respectively, on the network) can be trained by ANNs (Mosavi, Ozturk, & Chau, 2018). A trained ANN can be used to forecast the result of a new independent input dataset (Toro, Gómez Meire, Gálvez, & Fdez‐Riverola, 2013; Dash, Mishra, Sahany, & Panigrahi, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most developing countries, because of the limited data sources, realistic situations favour black box models (Latt & Wittenberg, 2014). Any relation between a number of dependent and independent variables (inputs and outputs, respectively, on the network) can be trained by ANNs (Mosavi, Ozturk, & Chau, 2018). A trained ANN can be used to forecast the result of a new independent input dataset (Toro, Gómez Meire, Gálvez, & Fdez‐Riverola, 2013; Dash, Mishra, Sahany, & Panigrahi, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%