2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-019-02304-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flocking With Short-Range Interactions

Abstract: We study the large-time behavior of continuum alignment dynamics based on Cucker-Smale (CS)-type interactions which involve short-range kernels, that is, communication kernels with support much smaller than the diameter of the crowd. We show that if the amplitude of the interactions is larger than a finite threshold, then unconditional hydrodynamic flocking follows. Since we do not impose any regularity nor do we require the kernels to be bounded, the result covers both regular and singular interaction kernels… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives the conclusion that diam Ω(t ) remains uniformly bounded for all time (by N R 0 /2), and that the velocities align exponentially fast to a constant (following an argument of Morales, Peszek, and Tadmor [16], but with simplifications due to the a priori knowledge of the upper bound in Proposition 8). As happy a situation as this might seem on its face, the result is actually rather weak.…”
Section: Proposition 8 (An Upper Bound On the Separation Of Trajectormentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gives the conclusion that diam Ω(t ) remains uniformly bounded for all time (by N R 0 /2), and that the velocities align exponentially fast to a constant (following an argument of Morales, Peszek, and Tadmor [16], but with simplifications due to the a priori knowledge of the upper bound in Proposition 8). As happy a situation as this might seem on its face, the result is actually rather weak.…”
Section: Proposition 8 (An Upper Bound On the Separation Of Trajectormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…would be for Ω to be chain connected at scale R 0 /2 (in the sense described by Morales, Peszek, and Tadmor in [16]) and that some chain…”
Section: Proposition 8 (An Upper Bound On the Separation Of Trajectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with a sharp distinction between the macroscopic size of the system and the typical interaction length among the individuals. In this direction, we mention the recent paper [26], where, in the framework of mean-field approximation, the large time behavior of a continuum alignment dynamics based on CS-type interactions with finite-range kernel is studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both counterexamples can be ruled out assuming graph-connectivity of the flock at scale r 0 . If the flock is nearly aligned and initially connected such an assumption will propagate in time resulting in exponential alignment, see [25,30] and references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that if a flock is dense at scale r ′ , it is dense at any larger scale r ′′ > r ′ , and every flock is trivially dense at the global scale r = diam Ω n . It is also clear that every part of a dense flock can be connected by a graph with legs of size < r. In fact, dense flocks are also automatically chain connected at scale r in the sense defined in [25]. If r = r 0 , where r 0 is the communication range (11), then clearly there exists a c > 0 depending only on δ, c 0 , r 0 such that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%