1981
DOI: 10.1128/aem.41.1.318-320.1981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flocculants for Recovery of Food-Borne Viruses

Abstract: The procedure described permits comparison of polyelectrolytes for their ability to flocculate food solids and thus enable filtration for recovery of food-bome viruses. We reported several years ago that Cat-Floc, a polycation sewage flocculant (Calgon Corp., Pittsburgh, Pa.), was useful in separating food solids to permit the recovery of enteroviruses from shellfish (4) and other foods (5). However, Cat-Floc is unavailable in many other countries. We therefore sought means of identifying alternate products th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.7 ml/75-cm2 flask) was shown to produce a greater number of PFU than inoculation of monolayers with greater volumes (21). The 2.5-ml inocula used in these studies are a compromise between those investigators who used less (7, 17, 24-26, 31) and those who used more (15,18,28) per 75-cm2 monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.7 ml/75-cm2 flask) was shown to produce a greater number of PFU than inoculation of monolayers with greater volumes (21). The 2.5-ml inocula used in these studies are a compromise between those investigators who used less (7, 17, 24-26, 31) and those who used more (15,18,28) per 75-cm2 monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting concentrate was adjusted to pH 7.2, treated with antibiotics, and assayed for virus. The relative efficiency of this procedure was obtained by comparing virus recoveries with those of several existing procedures (9,13,19). The procedure routinely recovered a significantly greater number of viruses (data not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this and limited support from other sources, we planned to produce the viruses in Madison and send them to Lowell to be inoculated into the shellfish and irradiated as was done in the earlier study, with the soft tissue shipped back frozen for assay in our laboratory. Extraction of the virus was to be done by our ''Cat-Floc'' method (Kostenbader and Cliver 1981). Because of the high cost of irradiation, we mixed poliovirus 1 (PO1) with HAV, so that they could be inoculated and irradiated together.…”
Section: Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtrates could be filter-sterilized (0.20 lm porosity) and concentrated before testing in cell culture; recoveries of at least 80% were recorded with optimal selection of procedures. In a later version, the Whatman GF/F glass fiber filter was substituted and a great number (seven dry-form and 13 liquid) of polyelectrolytes were compared for recovery of PO1 from ground beef (Kostenbader and Cliver 1981). Cat-Floc T performed best among the liquids (88% recovery), and Cation 105C (ICI America, Wilmington, Del.)…”
Section: Food Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%