2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floating Treatment Wetland influences on the fate of metals in road runoff retention ponds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured pollution removal performance (ER) of the FTW was calculated to be 80% for TSS, 53% for TP, and 17% for TN (Table 2. These removal rates are encouraging when compared to findings of previous stormwater FTW pond studies [11][12][13][14]. The improved removal rates are believed to be the result of the unique experimental design that excluded potential short-circuiting and specifically focused on evaluating the pollution removal performance of the field-scale FTW alone, rather than as part of a stormwater treatment train.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The measured pollution removal performance (ER) of the FTW was calculated to be 80% for TSS, 53% for TP, and 17% for TN (Table 2. These removal rates are encouraging when compared to findings of previous stormwater FTW pond studies [11][12][13][14]. The improved removal rates are believed to be the result of the unique experimental design that excluded potential short-circuiting and specifically focused on evaluating the pollution removal performance of the field-scale FTW alone, rather than as part of a stormwater treatment train.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Following these early successes, FTWs have since been used for a variety of purposes including treatment of pollution emanating from mine tailings [4][5][6][7], and pollution removal from stormwater [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the larger peaking factor of CSOs, the existing CSO CWs in the US appear to have high hydraulic loading rates and short hydraulic retention time. Therefore, plant uptake of nutrients might be limited relative to physical removal mechanisms as reported by Borne et al [32] for metal removal from stormwater in floating wetlands. Meanwhile, emergent plants in FWS wetlands and plant roots under floating islands may enhance sedimentation and filtration and provide microorganisms with solid surfaces to carry biofilms.…”
Section: Configuration Of Wetland Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%