2002 IEEE International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 2002. (FPT). Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/fpt.2002.1188677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floating-point bitwidth analysis via automatic differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy guaranteed approaches employ static analysis and thus cannot always determine the number of iterations. Existing approaches [1,6] cover loops by simply unrolling them, however this technique is not practical for programs with large iteration spaces.…”
Section: Code Analysis and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy guaranteed approaches employ static analysis and thus cannot always determine the number of iterations. Existing approaches [1,6] cover loops by simply unrolling them, however this technique is not practical for programs with large iteration spaces.…”
Section: Code Analysis and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdul Gaffer et al [1] use an approach called automatic differentiation which involves looking at the signals at different times and determining the width. Although this approach tends to be less time-consuming, neither approach is guaranteed to produce correct results for a given input.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first is a simulation-based approach [2,3,4] and involves optimizing the widths given input data from a specific training set. This has the obvious difficulty of choosing the training set, and the simulation is not guaranteed to produce results within the error requirement for every input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%