2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2010.5509864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FLIRT - Interest regions for 2D range data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To train, FLIRT [18] features and 128-dimensional descriptors are extracted for every incoming scan. The generated descriptors are inserted into randomized kd-trees provided by the FLANN library [20], granting the ability to rapidly query for nearest neighbors in the 128-dimensional feature space.…”
Section: A Correspondence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To train, FLIRT [18] features and 128-dimensional descriptors are extracted for every incoming scan. The generated descriptors are inserted into randomized kd-trees provided by the FLANN library [20], granting the ability to rapidly query for nearest neighbors in the 128-dimensional feature space.…”
Section: A Correspondence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy is not view-point invariant which makes it unsuitable for a multi-robot localization task. Several works have developed laser-based feature detection and description methods [17], [18] that can be used to rapidly detect correspondences. We choose to use FLIRT features [18] introduced by Tipaldi et al due to their rotational invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the digital map and the localization that uses it should be based on natural landmarks. Promising results are shown with FLIRT features [8] and occupancy grid maps [9]. However, there exists also the graph-based SLAM solutions based directly on point clouds.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated several laser-based methods for pose estimation such as exhaustive search [5] and feature-based approaches [6,7]. However, because our limited onboard computational resources, we chose the Iterative Closest Point (lCP) algo rithm [8], which yields a robust and inexpensive continuous pose estimate.…”
Section: A Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%