2009
DOI: 10.1021/bi8015907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flip and Flop: A Molecular Determinant for AMPA Receptor Channel Opening

Abstract: Alternative splicing in the extracellular ligand binding domain of the AMPA receptors generates two variants, i.e., flip and flop. The flop variant of the GluR2 AMPA receptor is known to desensitize faster than the flip counterpart, whereas the GluR1 flip and flop variants exhibit the same rate of desensitization. However, whether the alternative splicing affects the channel opening kinetic properties of these receptors is unknown. Using a laser-pulse photolysis technique, we have characterized the channel ope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(176 reference statements)
14
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16,33,34 Apparently, these compounds cannot be used to control the difference in various functional properties between the flip and flop isoforms of GluA2, such as desensitization 35−39 and channel opening reaction. 40 Together, these data show that the single stereoisomeric difference at the C-4 position gives rise to the difference in biological activity of BDZ-d and BDZ-e in that the S configuration significantly diminishes the activity of the enantiomer on the same receptor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…15,16,33,34 Apparently, these compounds cannot be used to control the difference in various functional properties between the flip and flop isoforms of GluA2, such as desensitization 35−39 and channel opening reaction. 40 Together, these data show that the single stereoisomeric difference at the C-4 position gives rise to the difference in biological activity of BDZ-d and BDZ-e in that the S configuration significantly diminishes the activity of the enantiomer on the same receptor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Cartridges were prepared by coating 10 mg gold particles (1 m; BioRad) with 10 g endotoxin-free plasmid encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (pEGFP-N1; Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany) as reporter alone, or in combination with 10 g pcDNA3.0 plasmid encoding one of the following AMPAR variants: GluA1(Q)-flip, GluA1(Q)-flop, the dominant-negative mutant GluA1(R)-flip (Pei et al, 2009)…”
Section: Expression Plasmids and Biolistic Transfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMPAR flip subunitcontaining receptors are more efficiently activated by glutamate and they desensitize with slower kinetics (Mosbacher et al, 1994;Sommer et al, 1990). GluA3(Q)-flip receptors, for example, recover more quickly from desensitization and display 4-fold longer channel open times than GluA3(Q)-flop (Pei et al, 2007;Pei et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Importance Of Flip and (Q) Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative splicing of GluA1-4 generates 2 different variants of each subunit (flip or flop), forming AMPA receptors with distinct kinetic properties. [7][8][9] In addition, AMPA and KA receptor transcripts can be modified by RNA editing. 10 The most frequent RNA editing process in eukaryotes involves conversion of adenosine to inosine catalyzed by the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative splicing of GluA1-4 generates 2 different variants of each subunit (flip or flop), forming AMPA receptors with distinct kinetic properties. [7][8][9] In addition, AMPA and KA receptor transcripts can be modified by RNA editing. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%