2009
DOI: 10.2514/1.43563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Testing of Multiple-Spacecraft Control on SPHERES During Close-Proximity Operations

Abstract: A multiple-spacecraft close-proximity control algorithm was implemented and tested with the Synchronized Position Hold Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellites (SPHERES) facility onboard the International Space Station. During flight testing, a chaser satellite successfully approached a virtual target satellite while avoiding collision with a virtual obstacle satellite. This research contributes to the control of multiple spacecraft for emerging missions, which may require simultaneous gathering, rendezvous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) has been previously developed at NPS for spacecraft relative position, and it is the starting point for this work [14]. It combines the efficiency of the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with the robust collision avoidance capability of the artificial potential function (APF) method.…”
Section: Lqr/apf Control Algorithm For Multiple Spacecraft Proximity mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) has been previously developed at NPS for spacecraft relative position, and it is the starting point for this work [14]. It combines the efficiency of the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with the robust collision avoidance capability of the artificial potential function (APF) method.…”
Section: Lqr/apf Control Algorithm For Multiple Spacecraft Proximity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is currently utilizing the Space Systems Laboratory's synchronized position hold engage and reorient experimental satellites (SPHERES) both on the ground and inside the International Space Station for validation of navigation and control algorithms [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1 are shown the initial positions and the initial masses of the two FSSs. To evaluate the IDVD-SGRA performances, for both types docking execution D1 and D2, the same maneuvers have been performed using an LQR controller [7][8][9][10][11]. Since such controller does not enforce any constraint on the maximum maneuver time, in order to ensure that this parameter is equal for all the controllers, we have first executed the dockings with the LQR then we have set the resulting maneuver times as t MAX for the IDVD-SGRA (Table 1).…”
Section: Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purposes, the same set of docking maneuvers has also been executed using an LQR controller [7][8][9][10][11]. The results show that the docking trajectories performed with the IDVD-SGRA guidance are characterized by a lower amount of total maneuver energy and fuel consumption with respect to the LQR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method of multivariable feedback control system design, the LQR technology is widely used in many practical engineering fields [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], especially in the control of conventional layout fixed-wing UAV and unmanned helicopter [12][13][14][15][16], which has many advantages such as more than 60°phase margin, infinite amplitude margin and strong robustness. In literature [12] [13], it has realized the stability augmentation control of conventional layout fixed-wing UAV by using conventional LQR method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%