Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Technologies 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45359-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Testing of a HLF Wing with Suction, Ice-Protection and Anti-Contamination Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active (or hardware-based) systems include mechanical devices such as covers, scrapers and shields [138][139][140][141]. Many of these concepts have proven effective in a research setting; however, added complexity and weight penalties have prevented usage on commercial aircraft [15,83].…”
Section: Methods For Insect Contamination Alleviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active (or hardware-based) systems include mechanical devices such as covers, scrapers and shields [138][139][140][141]. Many of these concepts have proven effective in a research setting; however, added complexity and weight penalties have prevented usage on commercial aircraft [15,83].…”
Section: Methods For Insect Contamination Alleviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single fluidic system, with anticontamination and anti-icing capabilities, was developed under the HYLTEC project for the DLR Do228 test vehicle. Humphreys and Horstmann [63] explain why it is necessary to use foam, rather than liquid, where suction on the attachment line is required.…”
Section: Anti-icingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the obvious weight and liquid usage disadvantages, undesirable time delays would also result at start-up and shut-down. These incompatibilities and disadvantages can be overcome if the liquid can be transported through plenum chamber and skin in a foamed state [63].…”
Section: Anti-icingmentioning
confidence: 99%