2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight force production by flapping insect wings in inclined stroke plane kinematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are shown in figures 8(a), (b), (c) and (d). Comparison of instantaneous non-dimensional vertical force coefficient, as predicted by the present methodology, with a benchmark case reported by Sudhakar and Vengadesan [57] at Re = 150 for kinematics-2 is shown in figure 9.…”
Section: 4dmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are shown in figures 8(a), (b), (c) and (d). Comparison of instantaneous non-dimensional vertical force coefficient, as predicted by the present methodology, with a benchmark case reported by Sudhakar and Vengadesan [57] at Re = 150 for kinematics-2 is shown in figure 9.…”
Section: 4dmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Validation study: Comparison of instantaneous nondimensional horizontal and vertical force coefficients, as predicted by the present methodology, with benchmark cases documented by Wang [56], Gao et al [17] and Sudhakar and Vengadesan [57] at Re = 157 for kinematics-1 are shown in figures 7(a) and (b), respectively.…”
Section: 4dmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the corrugated airfoils are compared with flat plate and NACA 0015 airfoil. We observed that the vortices formed on the corrugated aerofoil and shed into its wakes produces lower integral force fluctuation because of the its upstream peak height which allows the flow to reattach near the trailing edge of the airfoil by delaying flow separation [10][11][12]. The aerodynamic performance i.e., (L/D) ratio of the modified wing -I (MW-I) is better compared to MW-II and NACA 0015 at 0° angle of attack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1 Validation. The code developed based on the above scheme was validated for fluid flow characteristics by Sudhakar and Vengadesan [27,28]. The buoyancy driven flow was also validated in Raman et al [29].…”
Section: Problem Definition and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%