“…These fatigue levels are influenced by type of operation, duty duration, continuous-duty overnights, reserve practices, reduced rest, lack of breaks, restricted rest periods, and duty report times (Avers et al, 2009; Roma et al, 2010). Some of the key conclusions resulting from these studies indicated that the industry needs to:- identify ways to improve schedules from a science-based approach to maximize alertness and minimize fatigue while meeting operational and economic constraints of the industry;
- develop an adaptive fatigue mitigation safety system such as a fatigue risk management system (FRMS) that combines scientific principles and knowledge with operational support and constraints;
- apply scientific modeling tools to maximize alertness and minimize fatigue while meeting operational and economic constraints;
- develop and administer a comprehensive, science-based fatigue countermeasure training program; and
- establish a flight attendant fatigue workgroup of subject matter experts, aviation stakeholders, medical and research scientists, and aviation safety management system (SMS) experts to evaluate 14 CFR sections 121.467 and 135.273 for possible revision (Avers, Hauck, Blackwell, & Nesthus, 2009; Avers, King, Nesthus, Thomas, & Banks, 2009; Banks, Avers, Nesthus, & Hauck, 2009; Holcomb et al, 2009; Nesthus et al, 2007; Roma et al, 2010).
…”