1987
DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1987.23051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flicker (1/f) noise generated by a random walk of electrons in interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free carrier absorption and internal photoemission in HIWIP detectors lead to carrier number fluctuations, which would result in current fluctuations in the external circuit when a net current flows through the detector. This kind of noise is related to the presence of interface localized states [8]. The interface states N is has been estimated [9] ) reported for MBE grown Be-doped p-type GaAs [10].…”
Section: Negative Capacitancementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The free carrier absorption and internal photoemission in HIWIP detectors lead to carrier number fluctuations, which would result in current fluctuations in the external circuit when a net current flows through the detector. This kind of noise is related to the presence of interface localized states [8]. The interface states N is has been estimated [9] ) reported for MBE grown Be-doped p-type GaAs [10].…”
Section: Negative Capacitancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is found that the 1/f noise power density is proportional to I d h with an h value of 2.05 2.10. This type of behavior indicates that the origin of the 1/f noise could be interpreted in terms of a random fluctuation in the occupancy of the interface trap centers which can lead to generation-recombination (G-R) 1/f noise [8]. The free carrier absorption and internal photoemission in HIWIP detectors lead to carrier number fluctuations, which would result in current fluctuations in the external circuit when a net current flows through the detector.…”
Section: Negative Capacitancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…with and (9) In general, for the source biasing condition stated above, the coherence function , so the noise sources at B and C are fully correlated and only is dominant. In the case of modern deep-submicron MOSFETs with very thin gate oxides, it is tempting to state that the same expressions with the following changes are applicable ; ; ; ; ; and .…”
Section: Why Bjtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the change in Fano factor cannot be explained by a change in barrier height. Also processes as the modulation of the carrier density and defects at the barrier and fluctuations in the surface generation-recombination current cannot explain the change in Fano factor [189][190][191][192]. All these processes are related to 1/f noise which is usually dominant at f < 100 kHz and therefore not present in our measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%