2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus, and pH Profile of Self‐etch Resin Luting Cements

Abstract: The self-etching resin cements evaluated in this study displayed disparate properties and cannot be considered a homogeneous group. Flexural strength properties were most uniform and were similar to those of the conventional resin cements, whereas moduli of elasticity showed greater variation. Setting pH profiles differed, depending on the brand and mode of cure, even within the same category of luting cement. All cements with dual-cure capability, both conventional and self-etch, showed significantly superior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
66
1
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
66
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Han [22] , the pH value for RXU was 7.0 48 hours after cementation, while GCM (pH 3.6) and SMC (pH 4.0) maintained in a significant lower pH level. Similar results have been shown in a study by Saskalauskaite [26]. Further studies are needed to determine if a low pH level influences the adhesion of cements to dentin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study by Han [22] , the pH value for RXU was 7.0 48 hours after cementation, while GCM (pH 3.6) and SMC (pH 4.0) maintained in a significant lower pH level. Similar results have been shown in a study by Saskalauskaite [26]. Further studies are needed to determine if a low pH level influences the adhesion of cements to dentin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, pretreatment of the dentin facilitates to create a real hybrid layer which occurred with PAN but not with RXU [4]. Furthermore, differences in shrinkage behaviour [24], physical properties [25,26], pH values, and film thickness [22] of different self-adhesive resin cements were shown in a number of studies. In a study by Kitzmüller [24], shrinkage behaviour was depended on the temperature of the cement and the curing mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previously reported studies, [24][25][26] the lower values of bond strength obtained for Clearfil SA Cement can be explained by the inability of this cement to remove the smear layer on the dentin surface, as is the case with other self-adhesive resin cements. This leads to the formation of a poor hybridization layer between the resin cement and dentin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, other studies have pointed out that the elastic modulus of resin cement plays a positive role in the strength of ceramic crowns 12,35) . In our study, the elastic modulus of resin cement is 5.5 GPa for RelyX ARC and 7.8 GPa for RelyX Unicem 36) , but neither produced an influence on the fracture loads of IPS e.max CAD all-ceramic crowns and onlays. This may be explained by the fact that the inherent fracture resistance of IPS e.max CAD material surpasses that produced from the resin cement 27) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%