2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural response of concrete-filled seamless steel tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Ren et al [ 23 ] reported that PSDM was conservative for CFST beams with elliptical cross-sections. A series of studies showed that the predicted results from the simplified formulations in line with the Unified Theory were in close agreement with test results of circular CFST beams, but the Unified Theory-based formulations produced unconservative errors for square and rectangular CFST beams with low concrete-to-steel rations in a few cases [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. With respect to composite CFST beams, Moon et al [ 10 ] reported PSDM gave a reasonably conservative prediction for the bending resistance of a T-shaped composite CFST girder composed of CFST circular beams and concrete slabs under both positive and negative bending moments, based on experimental and numerical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, Ren et al [ 23 ] reported that PSDM was conservative for CFST beams with elliptical cross-sections. A series of studies showed that the predicted results from the simplified formulations in line with the Unified Theory were in close agreement with test results of circular CFST beams, but the Unified Theory-based formulations produced unconservative errors for square and rectangular CFST beams with low concrete-to-steel rations in a few cases [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. With respect to composite CFST beams, Moon et al [ 10 ] reported PSDM gave a reasonably conservative prediction for the bending resistance of a T-shaped composite CFST girder composed of CFST circular beams and concrete slabs under both positive and negative bending moments, based on experimental and numerical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To ascertain the relationships between M 0 and ξ , V f , the experimental results from Refs. 29, 59, 60 are conducted into a regression analysis as shown in Figure 17e,f. The relationships can be taken as: M0=γnormalmWscfscnormalyfVf γnormalm=1.156+0.232lnξ0.253 fVf=1.000+0.087Vnormalf0.040Vf2 The predicted M 0,pre are listed in Table 7 and compared with the tested results M 0,exp .…”
Section: Prediction Of Eccentric Bearing Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research investigations on CFST columns for on-site construction were conducted experimentally and numerically under different loading conditions, such as compression [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], bending [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and tensions [28][29][30][31][32]. In the conventional construction of CFST columns, welded connections are widely used to connect one steel tube to another steel tube of CFST columns, which is assumed to behave similarly to continuous CFST columns without connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%